2001
DOI: 10.1109/35.948410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATM traffic management in an LMDS wireless access network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two types of access schemes can be employed for transmission of data from individuallydistributed wireless terminals to contention less and contention-based access points. In the effort to diminish packet loss as a result of collision, the contention-based system [5][6][7][8] requires smaller control packet and lower collision probability. As such, several MAC protocols were developed for application in wireless networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of access schemes can be employed for transmission of data from individuallydistributed wireless terminals to contention less and contention-based access points. In the effort to diminish packet loss as a result of collision, the contention-based system [5][6][7][8] requires smaller control packet and lower collision probability. As such, several MAC protocols were developed for application in wireless networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the contention-based scheme [5][6][7][8] reducing the collision probability and the size of control packet is necessary to reduce wastage of bandwidth in case of collision. On the other hand, the contention-free scheme [9][10][11][12] is based on either a piggyback mechanism, which piggybacks the dynamic parameters on the uplink data burst, or polling mechanism, which dynamically assigns an uplink dedicated slot for transferring the dynamic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%