2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2463-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atlas of Muscle Innervation Zones

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply , even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
166
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
166
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org Interface Focus 5: 20140076 towards each end of the muscle. Despite the simplified example set-up, the predicted EMG compares qualitatively well with the experimental sEMG data of Farina et al [1] and Barbero et al [39]. A quantitative comparison is difficult as experimental EMG signals depend heavily on properties that are difficult to control in experiments, for example the MU territories and the thickness of the subcutaneous tissue [40].…”
Section: Surface and Intramuscular Electromyography During Fixed-lengmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org Interface Focus 5: 20140076 towards each end of the muscle. Despite the simplified example set-up, the predicted EMG compares qualitatively well with the experimental sEMG data of Farina et al [1] and Barbero et al [39]. A quantitative comparison is difficult as experimental EMG signals depend heavily on properties that are difficult to control in experiments, for example the MU territories and the thickness of the subcutaneous tissue [40].…”
Section: Surface and Intramuscular Electromyography During Fixed-lengmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Lifting technique was based on the discretion of the individual and the subject's box weight was determined by their maximum psychophysically acceptable weight (Table 1). Electromyography (EMG) (Delsys Inc. 2000Hz) sensors were then placed on the right side internal oblique (IO), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (Mf) at the fifth lumbar (L5) spinal level, as well as the rectus femoris(RF), vastus medialis (VM), semitendinosus (ST), gluteus maximus (GMx) and gluteus medius (GMd) all on the subjects right side (Barbero, Merletti, Rainoldi, 2012). Ground reaction forces (GRFs) were collected for each leg (AMTI 2000Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likely location of the IZ for the TA was estimated to be 34% between the tibila tuberosity and intermalleolar line from the tibila tuberosity [41]. The skin was cleaned and exfoliated before placing the electrode array over the TA and the reference electrodes were placed on the ankle.…”
Section: Electrode Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%