2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atlas-based Segmentation in Prostate IMRT: Timesavings in the Clinical Workflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,4,5,16 Two of these 4,16 address the male pelvis. Lin et al 4 gives the timings for individual structures (femurs, prostate, bladder and rectum) and found broadly similar time savings-the rectum was the structure that showed the least time saving in their study. We found statistically significant reductions in delineation times for all but three structures-the body, rectum and seminal vesicles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,4,5,16 Two of these 4,16 address the male pelvis. Lin et al 4 gives the timings for individual structures (femurs, prostate, bladder and rectum) and found broadly similar time savings-the rectum was the structure that showed the least time saving in their study. We found statistically significant reductions in delineation times for all but three structures-the body, rectum and seminal vesicles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the time saving varies from around 25-50% of the manual outlining time. [1][2][3][4][5] Only one of these studies documents the time saving per structure, and this indicated that the time saved depends on the structure being outlined. 4 Gambacorta et al 5 postulate that for structures where their autocontouring system was unreliable, the correction time becomes important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autocontouring has been shown to improve consistency and efficiency in definitive prostate cancer using the same commercially available software we used (9,10). With institutionally developed software, contouring whole breast volumes required approximately 30% less time, and the consistency of the contours also improved (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contours are then mapped to the patient by deforming those from the matched atlas subject. Atlas-based segmentation has been shown to save contouring time and improve consistency in treatment planning for prostate and head-and-neck cancers (9)(10)(11). This approach could also be valuable for nodal target volume delineation in endometrial cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Another popular method that has often seen commercial implementation is the atlas-based approach that uses the coregistration of a large database of patient scans to produce a probabilistic map of expected uptake values for healthy patients and then uses deviations from this map to determine where abnormal regions lie. 24,25 While there has been a plethora of work regarding proper PET segmentation, the problem remains a challenging one that has not been satisfactorily resolved using single modality methods. A more thorough review of PET segmentation algorithms can be found in surveys by Zaidi and El Naqa 26 and Sheperd et al 27 We have adapted an active contour approach due to its ability to define the contour using a continuous function which can intuitively adapt to topological changes such as splitting and merging of multiple regions, as encountered in a heterogenous tumor and to achieve subpixel accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%