2017
DOI: 10.1137/140970951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATLAS: A Geometric Approach to Learning High-Dimensional Stochastic Systems Near Manifolds

Abstract: When simulating multiscale stochastic differential equations (SDEs) in high-dimensions, separation of timescales, stochastic noise and high-dimensionality can make simulations prohibitively expensive. The computational cost is dictated by microscale properties and interactions of many variables, while the behavior of interest often occurs at the macroscale level and at large time scales, often characterized by few important, but unknown, degrees of freedom. For many problems bridging the gap between the micros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vast array of methods developed to address these goals can be broadly categorized as state-space or operator-theoretic methods [1]. A popular state-space approach is to approximate a nonlinear dynamical system by a collection of local linear models on the tangent planes of the attractor [2][3][4]; other approaches construct global nonlinear models for the dynamical evolution map [5], or nonlinearly project the attractor to lower-dimensional Euclidean spaces and construct reduced models operating in those spaces [6][7][8]. A common element of these techniques is that the forward operators of the reduced models are defined in state space; i.e., they map the state at a given time to another state in the future.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast array of methods developed to address these goals can be broadly categorized as state-space or operator-theoretic methods [1]. A popular state-space approach is to approximate a nonlinear dynamical system by a collection of local linear models on the tangent planes of the attractor [2][3][4]; other approaches construct global nonlinear models for the dynamical evolution map [5], or nonlinearly project the attractor to lower-dimensional Euclidean spaces and construct reduced models operating in those spaces [6][7][8]. A common element of these techniques is that the forward operators of the reduced models are defined in state space; i.e., they map the state at a given time to another state in the future.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we assume that the noise coefficient is a known constant: there has been of course significant work in estimating the noise coefficient, for example in the case of interacting particle systems see the recent work [26] and references therein, and for the case of model reduction for Langevin equations with state-dependent diffusion coefficient [19].…”
Section: (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deterministic multi-particle systems, various types of learning techniques have been developed (see, e.g., [9,14,40,41,50,55] and the reference therein). When it comes to stochastic multi-particle systems, only a few efforts have been made, e.g., learning reduced Langevin equations on manifolds in [19] (without, however, assuming nor exploiting the structure of pairwise interactions), learning parametric potential functions in [10,15] from single trajectory data, estimating the diffusion parameter in [26], and estimating effective Langevin equations on manifolds in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2006 ; Singer et al. 2009 ; Crosskey and Maggioni 2017 ; Vanden-Eijnden 2007 ; Kevrekidis and Samaey 2009 ). However, all of these approaches still depend on some local form of time scale separation between the “fast” and the “slow” components of the dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%