2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022jc018568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atlantic Water Properties, Transport and Heat Loss From Mooring Observations North of Svalbard

Abstract: As the Arctic sea ice declines over the last decades, understanding and monitoring the Atlantic Water (AW), the main source of heat and salt of the Arctic Ocean, has become increasingly more important (Carmack et al., 2015;Polyakov et al., 2017). AW enters the Arctic Ocean through both the Barents Sea and Fram Strait. The Fram Strait branch enters the Arctic Ocean with the West Spitsbergen Current (WSC), on the continental slope west of Svalbard. On the southern tip of the Yermak Plateau, the WSC splits in dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed velocities are dominated by the boundary current, transporting AW into the Arctic Ocean. The boundary current variability has been discussed before 29 and exhibits a substantial seasonal cycle with peak velocities in winter and minima in summer (Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The observed velocities are dominated by the boundary current, transporting AW into the Arctic Ocean. The boundary current variability has been discussed before 29 and exhibits a substantial seasonal cycle with peak velocities in winter and minima in summer (Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We estimated the uncertainty in the volume transport by constructing a 2D-matrix of error distribution of velocity that takes into account the instrumental error as well as the distance to the closest observation data point so that this uncertainty varies with depth and distance to the data point. This uncertainty section is constructed following the method of Koenig et al, 2022: (a) a nominal uncertainty estimate of the velocity measurements of 0.01 cm•s −1 at each mooring location, (b) one standard deviation of the observed velocity measurements at 4 km distance on both sides of the mooring and (c) two standard deviations of the observed velocity measurements mid-way between pairs of mooring. We choose the conservative value of 4 km as decorrelation scale as it corresponds to the Rossby deformation radius that is about 4-6 km in the region (Nurser & Bacon, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the NSv site, a low‐intensity but sustained wind stress event resulted in a well‐mixed water column from January until May (Henley et al., 2020), while a prolonged period of high TPM fluxes was observed from February until April. Although current velocity data are unavailable for the 2017–2018 deployment period, increased current speeds of the AW advected into the area north of Svalbard were recorded during winter 2018–2019 (Koenig et al., 2022). A considerable and sustained disturbance of the seabed favoring resuspension is possible under sustained wind speeds promoting turbulence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%