2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATL3 Is a Tubular ER-Phagy Receptor for GABARAP-Mediated Selective Autophagy

Abstract: Highlights d ATL3 is an ER-phagy receptor and promotes tubular ER degradation d ATL3 specifically binds to GABARAP via 2 GABARAP interaction motifs (GIMs) d Sensory neuropathy-associated ATL3 mutations reduce ATL3-GABARAP binding d Sensory neuropathy-associated ATL3 mutations impair ATL3's function in ER-phagy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
196
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
196
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation with ATL3 thus parallels RTN3L, where a known ER‐reshaping factor also acts as a receptor, potentially combining ER recognition and membrane‐reshaping principles. A point mutation within the GIM of ATL3 that precludes GABARAP‐binding was found in the neuropathy HSAN type I , suggesting that dysfunctional ER‐phagy is part of the disease mechanism. Interestingly, loss‐of‐function of human ATL1 , which also participates in ER‐phagy (discussed above), underlies a related degenerative condition of the central nervous system termed hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) .…”
Section: Er‐phagy Pathways: Mechanisms and Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation with ATL3 thus parallels RTN3L, where a known ER‐reshaping factor also acts as a receptor, potentially combining ER recognition and membrane‐reshaping principles. A point mutation within the GIM of ATL3 that precludes GABARAP‐binding was found in the neuropathy HSAN type I , suggesting that dysfunctional ER‐phagy is part of the disease mechanism. Interestingly, loss‐of‐function of human ATL1 , which also participates in ER‐phagy (discussed above), underlies a related degenerative condition of the central nervous system termed hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) .…”
Section: Er‐phagy Pathways: Mechanisms and Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ER‐phagy receptors appear to work independently from one another and primarily form homodimers/multimers. The only exception, thus far, was reported for RTN3L and ATL3, which were found to interact with one another after protein overexpression in HEK293T cells . Although the atlastins family member, ATL2, has not been officially defined as an ER‐phagy receptor, ATL2 interacts with FAM134B.…”
Section: How Is Er‐phagy Activated and What Kind Of Regulation Levelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only in recent years, after the characterization of the first ER-phagy receptors (see next paragraph), FAM134B in mammals and ATG39 and ATG40 in yeast [25,26], the molecular basis of ER-phagy was revealed and its full biological importance began to be recognized [10]. Several mammalian ER-phagy receptors have been identified so far: SEC62, RTN3 (its long isoform RTN3L), CCPG1, ATL3, and TEX264 [27][28][29][30][31][32] (Fig. 1A,B).…”
Section: The History Of Er-phagymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atg39 localizes to the perinuclear ER, while Atg40 is enriched in the cortical and cytoplasmic ER, suggesting that each protein is needed for the degradation of a different ER subdomain [25]. In mammals, six ER-resident autophagy receptors were identified to date: FAM134B [27], the long isoform of RTN3 (RTN3L) [28], CCPG1 (cell cycle progression 1) [29], SEC62 [30], AT3 (atlastin GTPase 3) [31] and TEX264 (testis expressed gene 264) [32,33]. The different receptors seem to differ in their function and ER subdomain localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different receptors seem to differ in their function and ER subdomain localization. FAM134B regulates starvation-induced turnover of ER sheets, while RTN3L and ATL3 are important for starvation-induced degradation of ER tubules [27,28,31]. CCPG1 and Sec62 are involved in ER stress induced ER-phagy [29 , 30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%