2014
DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atl

Abstract: PAX1 showed great potential as a biomarker for cervical cancer screening. When incorporating PAX1 detection into current screening protocol, the efficacy of screening could be greatly improved. Moreover, unnecessary referral for colposcopy and biopsy could be reduced up to 60%. However, prospective population-based studies are necessary for further implementation of this screening program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A published research suggested that the methylation test of PAX1 gene harbored higher diagnostic accuracy against HPV DNA testing in detecting cervical cancer (20). Similarly, other studies also documented that quantitative measurement of PAX1 hypermethylation in cervical scrapings is highly accurate than both SOX1 hypermethylation and HPV DNA assay, which the sensitivity was 0.86, and specificity was 0.85 under the ROC curve (12,17). Our results agree well with these data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A published research suggested that the methylation test of PAX1 gene harbored higher diagnostic accuracy against HPV DNA testing in detecting cervical cancer (20). Similarly, other studies also documented that quantitative measurement of PAX1 hypermethylation in cervical scrapings is highly accurate than both SOX1 hypermethylation and HPV DNA assay, which the sensitivity was 0.86, and specificity was 0.85 under the ROC curve (12,17). Our results agree well with these data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Among these altered and methylated genes, the paired boxed gene 1 (PAX1) and sex determining region Y-box 1 (SOX1) were both highlighted (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Numerous studies have documented the promise of PAX1 or SOX1 DNA methylation in distinguishing patients with reactive atypia or CIN3+ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type III or worse) lesions from normal uterine cervixes (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). In order to make a comparison of the accuracy of DNA methylation and HPV DNA testing, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis and evaluated the diagnostic performance of PAX1 and SOX1 methylation for cervical cancer screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data revealed that the detection of PAX1 methylation has clinical diagnostic value in differentiating invasive CC, but may not be sufficient alone in screening for HSIL. A number of studies have indicated the potential value of PAX1 for the screening and detection of CC (49,51,52), in line with the findings of the present study, but the association between PAX1 and tumors requires further investigation. The present study used methylation-specific PCR to demonstrate that the PAX1 gene is abnormally methylated in cervical cancer specimens, with methylation rates as high as 87.5%, which is significantly different to those in normal cervical tissues and cervical precancerous lesions (49).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Here, we found that the FAM19A4 marker alone had a similar performance in terms of CIN2þ, CIN3þ, and cervical carcinoma detection as a panel of previously studied methylation markers (11). Recently, other single methylation markers, i.e., PAX1 and ZNF582, have been reported as a promising methylation markers for cervical screening and women with LSIL, respectively (30,31). Yet, these markers have not been validated in population-based screening studies and require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%