Atividade antimicrobiana in vitro de plantas da Amazônia sobre alguns micro-organismos formadores do biofilme dental

Conde, Nikeila Chacon de Oliveira; Pereira, Maria do Socorro Vieira; Bandeira, Maria Fulgência Costa Lima; Venâncio, Gisely Naura; Oliveira, Glauber Palma de; Sampaio, Fábio Correia

doi:10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.17794

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Copaiba oil, regardless of its genus, presented results of bactericidal and/or bacteriostatic effect. The most studied microorganisms against copaiba in this systematic review were Streptococcus mutans (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2010;Pieri et al, 2012;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008) followed by Streptococcus sanguinis (Bardají et al, 2016;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008), Streptococcus sobrinus (Bardají et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;, Fusobacterium nucleatum (Bardají et al, 2016;, . Only one study demonstrated that copaiba oil presented antimicrobial effect similar or superior to the positive control used (Pieri et al, 2010).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Four thousand five hundred and thirty-five titles/abstracts were retrieved from the search strategy, of which 2,474 were excluded for being duplicated. Based on the previously described criteria, 84 full titles were evaluated, of which 11 were selected (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2010;Pieri, Mussi, Fiorini, Moreira, & Schneedorf, 2012;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos, Veiga Júnior, Rocha, & Bandeira, 2008).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different species of copaiba were used, as follows: Copaifera reticulate (Bardají et al, 2016), C. multijuga (Bari et al, 2016;Conde et al, 2015;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008), C. langsdorffii (Dias et al, 2015;, C. oblongifolia (da Silva Moraes et al, 2016), C. officinalis (Pieri et al, 2010;Pieri et al, 2012). The studies were essentially in vitro, and the main test was minimum inhibitory concentration (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2012;, followed by colony-forming units (Pieri et al, 2010;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The studies were essentially in vitro, and the main test was minimum inhibitory concentration (Bardají et al, 2016;Bari et al, 2016;da Silva Moraes et al, 2016;Dias et al, 2015;Pieri et al, 2012;, followed by colony-forming units (Pieri et al, 2010;Simões et al, 2016;Vasconcelos et al, 2008). Minimum bactericidal concentration (da Silva Moraes et al, 2016), and minor inhibitory concentration of adhesion (Conde et al, 2015) were less used methodologies. All studies, except one (Vasconcelos et al, 2008), used chlorhexidine as a positive control group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Antimicrobial activity of copaiba oil (Copaifera ssp.) on oral pathogens: Systematic review

Diefenbach

Muniz

Oballe

et al. 2017

Phytotherapy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Copaifera ssp. produces an oil-resin that presents antiinflammatory, antitumor, antiseptic, germicidal, antifungal, and antibacterial activity. This systematic review aimed to analyze the antimicrobial action of Copaiba oil against oral pathogens, when compared to that of control substances. A search on Medline/PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were performed up to March 2017. To be included, the studies needed to perform any antimicrobial activity essay, using copaiba oil and a control substance. The antimicrobial effect of each substance, in each study, was extracted. Eleven studies were included, and several copaiba species were used. All studies showed that copaiba oil, regardless of its species, presented a bactericidal and/or bacteriostatic effect in in vitro analyzes. Only one study showed that the antimicrobial effect of the Copaifera officinalis was similar to the one found in chlorhexidine. A higher risk of bias was detected in most of the included studies. The studies demonstrated that the antimicrobial activity of copaiba oil, in most cases, is lower than chlorhexidine, which is considered the gold standard. However, there is great potential against oral bacteria. Further high quality studies are warranted in order to assess the efficacy of copaiba oil on oral pathogens.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Antimicrobial activity of copaiba oil (Copaifera ssp.) on oral pathogens: Systematic review

Diefenbach

Muniz

Oballe

et al. 2017

Phytotherapy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A metodologia diferente daquela descrita por Marreiro (2011), que utilizou a solução extratora de etanol (96°C) através da técnica de decocção e relata que a escolha do etanol foi pelo fato de não se tratar de um álcool tóxi-co (Carvalho, 2001). Difere também da metodologia descrita por Conde (2006), na qual a extração dos marcadores químicos foi feita através de percolação a temperatura ambiente e utilizando o metanol (80%v/v) como extrator. Porém ao comparar os Tabela 2 -Concentração dos extratos da vagem e da casca do caule de jucá em diluição logarítmica.…”

Section: Resultados E Discussõesunclassified

Antimicrobial activityin vitroof extracts of the stem bark and fruit ofLibidibia ferreaL. against microorganisms of the oral cavity.

Oliveira¹,

Souza²,

Caetano³

et al. 2013

Revista Fitos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoNo presente estudo foi avaliada a ação antimicrobiana in vitro do extrato da casca do caule e da vagem de jucá frente a microrganismos da cavidade bucal. Tratou-se de um estudo experimental laboratorial, no qual foi avaliada a atividade antimicrobiana dos extratos aquosos a 7,5% em diluições variando de 1:1 a 1:512, através da técnica de difusão em ágar. Foram utilizadas cepas padrão de Streptococcus salivarius (ATCC 7073); Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175); Streptococcus oralis (ATCC 10557); Lactobacillus casei (ATCC 7469) e a Candida albicans (INCQS 40040). A clorexidina 0,12% foi utilizada como controle positivo. Os resultados da difusão em ágar demonstraram que quando avaliado frente ao L. casei, o extrato da vagem mostrou-se mais efetivo, com CIM em 9,3 mg/ml comparado à CIM da casca que foi 37,5 mg/ml. Quando o extrato da vagem foi testado frente aos S. oralis e S. mutans os valores de MIC foram iguais e o dobro, respectivamente, quando comparados com os valores obtidos com o extrato da casca do caule. Em relação a C. albicans, o valor de MIC para o extrato da vagem e da casca do caule foi 18,7 mg/ml. Enquanto que frente a S. salivarius o extrato da casca do caule teve valor de MIC 37,5 mg/ml e o extrato da vagem não apresentou atividade. Pode-se concluir que o extrato da casca do caule de jucá apresentou atividade antimicrobiana satisfatória frente aos patógenos da cavidade bucal e superior ao extrato da vagem. Palavras-chave:Libidibia ferrea L; Biofilme; Fitoterapia. AbstractIn the present study was evaluated in vitro antimicrobial activity of the extract of the stem bark and fruit jucá against microorganisms of the oral cavity. This was an experimental laboratory study in which was evaluated the antimicrobial activity of aqueous extracts 7.5% in dilutions ranging from 1:1 to 1:512, using the technique of agar diffusion. Standard strains used were: Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175), Streptococcus oralis (ATCC 10557), Lactobacillus casei (ATCC 7469), Candida albicans (INCQS 40040) and Streptococcus salivarius (ATCC 7073). Chlorhexidine 0.12 % was used as a positive control. The results of the agar diffusion showed that when assessed against L. casei, extract of the fruit was more effective, and with MICs 9.3 mg/mL compared to stem bark was 37.5 mg/mL. When the fruit extract were tested against S. oralis and S. mutans MIC values were the same and twice, respectively , when compared with values obtained with the extract of the stem bark . With respect to C. albicans, the MIC value for the extract of the fruit and stem bark was 18.7 mg/mL. While against S. salivarius extract of the stem bark had MIC value of 37.5 mg/mL and the extract of the fruit was inactive. It can be concluded that the extract of the stem bark of jucá showed satisfactory antimicrobial activity against pathogens of the oral cavity and superior to the extract of the fruit.

show abstract

Antimicrobial Activity of Extracts and Essential Oils of Medicinal Plants Occurring in Amazonia: Nanotechnology as a Boon to Enhance Bioactivity

Martins

Komesu

Oliveira

et al. 2022

Promising Antimicrobials From Natural Products

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Atividade antimicrobiana in vitro de plantas da Amazônia sobre alguns micro-organismos formadores do biofilme dental

Abstract: Objective: Performing a screening of Amazonian species as antimicrobial action of oral biofilm micro-organisms in vitro.

Cited by 9 publications

References 10 publications

Antimicrobial activity of copaiba oil (Copaifera ssp.) on oral pathogens: Systematic review

Antimicrobial activity of copaiba oil (Copaifera ssp.) on oral pathogens: Systematic review

Antimicrobial activityin vitroof extracts of the stem bark and fruit ofLibidibia ferreaL. against microorganisms of the oral cavity.

Antimicrobial Activity of Extracts and Essential Oils of Medicinal Plants Occurring in Amazonia: Nanotechnology as a Boon to Enhance Bioactivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About