Athlete's Role Identity: An Integrative Review of Measurement Instruments

Silva, Walan Robert da; Lisboa, Tailine; Folle, Alexandra; Melo, Gislane Ferreira de; Cardoso, Fernando Luíz

doi:10.1590/1517-869220202601186411

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…AIMS is the primary tool for measuring the athlete identity. 6 Brewer initially used the 10-item AIMS scale as a unidimensional measure in a sample of English-speaking culture, while this unidimensional structure was supported by other studies. 7,8 Since the early development of AIMS, researchers have been trying to validate and improve the measurement and conceptualization of AI.…”

Section: Psychologymentioning

confidence: 86%

Factor Validity of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale in a Mainland Chinese Sample

Meng

Shao

2021

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) is a multi-dimensional instrument for measuring athletic identity and has been validated in different cultural samples around the world, except in mainland China. Objective This study aimed to test the validity of the mainland Chinese version of AIMS. Methods The sample consisted of 205 athletes, including 150 student athletes and 55 retired athletes. Validation of the factor structure and internal consistency was tested by performing confirmatory factor analyses and calculating Cronbach’s alpha on eight different models proposed in the literature. Results The results indicated that the 7-item 2-factor model fit best in retired athlete samples, while the 7-item 3-factor model fit best in student athlete samples, according to stringent fitting criteria. Conclusion Based on the data analysis, it is proven that the 7-item multidimensional structure of AIMS is valid for the mainland Chinese culture. Level of evidence II; Comparative study.

show abstract

Section: Psychologymentioning

confidence: 86%

Factor Validity of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale in a Mainland Chinese Sample

Meng

Shao

2021

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is the commonest and most widely validated tool for measuring athlete identity—i.e. measuring the level at which the athletic role contributed to the self-concept of the respondents ( 12 ). However, validity of AIMS appears to differ between different athlete populations with some researchers adopting the 7-item and others the 10-item version of the questionnaire ( 13 , 14 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Athlete Identity, Resilience, Satisfaction with Life and Well-Being of Para Badminton Players: A Multinational Survey

Siew Li,

Ngan Ling,

Poh Li

et al. 2024

MJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To explore regional differences (i.e. Europe, Asia and others) in the wellbeing of para-athletes and its potential psychosocial determinants, including the Athletic Identity Measure Scale (AIMS), the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Methods: The study was a cross-sectional survey using data from multinational badminton federations. The study participants were athletes registered in the Para Badminton Classification Master List of the Badminton World Federation (BWF). The main study outcome is the WHO Quality of Life-Disability Questionnaire (WHOQOL-DIS). Results: There were 1,385 (aged 36 years old, IQR 18 years old) registrants on the master list. Respondents totaled 170. Only 137 (65% were males) were included in the analysis after excluding those with missing data (Europe 40%, Asia 30%, others 30%). Following the results of factor analysis, the original Athletic Identity Measure Scale (AIMS) was separated into self-identity (SI) and AIMS-modified. SI, AIMS-modified, the BRS and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) were all scored above average. The AIMS-modified scores of Europeans were significantly lower than those of other non-Asians (U = 757.000, P < 0.05). BRS was statistically higher among those with acquired disabilities (median: 3.33) compared to those with congenital disabilities (median: 3.0) (U = 1,717.000, Z = −2.711, P < 0.05) and among Europeans (median: 3.3) compared to Asians (median: 3.0) (U = 704.500, P < 0.05). The regression model explained 32% of the variability in quality of life (QOL) with five significant predictors. The SWLS (β = 0.307, P = 0.01), BRS (β = 0.269, P = 0.01), full-time employment (β = 0.191, P = 0.05) and being female (β = 0.162, P = 0.05) all had a positive effect on QOL, but not the AIMS (−0.228, P = 0.05). Conclusion: The results show that the athletes’ resilience, satisfaction with life and identity vary across regions. Furthermore, satisfaction with life, employment and gender were found to be significant predictors of athletes’ QOL.

show abstract

“…And none of them have been carried out to our knowledge in a French context. For this reason, it is difficult from the outset to predict the model that could correspond to our sample and given that previous studies recommend performing the AIMS validation process in order to verify the stability of the construct with different populations (Silva et al, 2020), this study therefore proposes to endorse an AIMS measurement scale appropriate to French athletic students. Likewise, this research aims to determine whether athletic identity is correlated with age, gender and the types of activities practiced.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the French Version of the Scale for Measuring Athletic Identity among French Student Athletes

Youssouf

Lebrun

2022

Int J Appl Sports Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this article is to examine the validity of a French version of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) with a sample of French varsity athletes according to different characteristics such as age, gender and types of sports activities practiced. To this end, 445 sports students answered a questionnaire measuring the degree of Likert-type sports identity on a 7-point scale. The sample included 272 men and 173 women with an average age of 21 years. Validation of the factor structure and internal consistency was tested by performing confirmatory factor analyzes and calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient on the four different models most proposed in the literature. The results related to the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four AIMS models tested in this study are not appropriate for the French context. On the other hand, they made it possible to identify a measurement model composed of two factors; identities and exclusivity. For the two factors, no significant difference appeared between the subgroups of age, sex and the types of sports activities practiced. Therefore, the two-factor model identified in this research stands out from the already existing models. To further test its robustness, it would therefore be desirable to test it in socio-cultural contexts close to that of France.

show abstract

Athlete's Role Identity: An Integrative Review of Measurement Instruments

Cited by 5 publications

References 25 publications

Factor Validity of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale in a Mainland Chinese Sample

Factor Validity of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale in a Mainland Chinese Sample

Athlete Identity, Resilience, Satisfaction with Life and Well-Being of Para Badminton Players: A Multinational Survey

Validation of the French Version of the Scale for Measuring Athletic Identity among French Student Athletes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About