We thank Tan et al 1 for their thoughtful review of our article. We agree that oncologists and cardiologists should work together to identify and monitor novel cardiac symptoms and treatment side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination regimens. However, it is not possible to make firm conclusions about the risk of myocardial infarction with combination ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy on the basis of our analysis. In particular, different TKIs were administered in the two arms of the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (axitinib and sunitinib) 2,3 ; thus, any differences may be due to the attributes of the TKI rather than the addition of an ICI. Furthermore, it is difficult to compare our data, which were obtained from a randomized, phase III, multicenter trial in a defined population of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, with real-world data, including the singleinstitution study reported by Tan et al, 1 which included patients with various tumor types who had received different ICIs (including anti-programmed cell death 1 protein, anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1, and anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 agents) and in which baseline cardiovascular risk factors were not well controlled. We agree with Tan et al 1 that additional research is needed to better assess noninflammatory cardiovascular events that may arise with ICI therapy, especially common events, such as myocardial infarction. In addition, more data are needed to determine the long-term sequelae of immunotherapies, especially as a growing number of patients are successfully treated with ICIs and become cancer survivors. 4 We strongly agree that well-controlled prospective trials are needed to rigorously assess potential cardiovascular risks with ICI-based combination regimens, particularly when ICIs are used in combination with chemotherapies or targeted therapies that may have their own cardiovascular sequelae. 5