Background and Purpose-A major disadvantage of carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared to carotid endarterectomy is the increased risk of cerebral embolism. Thus, establishing a simple method to discriminate fragile plaques on preoperative routine examination is important. The present study examined whether high-intensity signal (HIS) in the plaque on time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, performed for screening, can discriminate plaque at high risk for cerebral embolism during CAS. Methods-In the 30 patients treated using carotid endarterectomy, relationships between pathological findings of the plaques and TOF-MRA findings were analyzed. In the 112 patients treated using CAS, postoperative ipsilateral ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging and periprocedural ischemic symptoms were analyzed. Results-The percentage area of intraplaque hemorrhage stained by glycophorin A was significantly larger in HIS-positive plaques (51.8%Ϯ9.8%) than in HIS-negative plaques (8.6%Ϯ9.4%; PϽ0.001). Postoperative ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging were more frequent in the HIS-positive plaques (25/38; 65.8%) than in the HIS-negative plaques (26/74; 35.1%; Pϭ0.002). Periprocedural ischemic symptoms were more frequently observed in HIS-positive plaques (7/38; 18.4%) than in HIS-negative plaques (1/74; 1.4%; Pϭ0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified HIS on TOF-MRA as an independent predictor of periprocedural ischemic symptoms (odds ratio, 15.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.76 -129.0). Conclusions-HIS in the plaque on TOF-MRA performed for screening could discriminate plaques at high risk for cerebral embolism during CAS. (Stroke. 2011;42:3132-3137.)Key Words: carotid endarterectomy Ⅲ carotid stenosis Ⅲ risk factors Ⅲ stenting A lthough carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the established treatment for stroke prevention, carotid artery stenting (CAS) recently has emerged as a less invasive alternative to CEA. Two randomized controlled trials have shown that CAS and CEA offer similar efficacy, 1,2 whereas another 3 randomized studies have reported that CEA is superior to CAS. [3][4][5] Indications for CAS thus remain controversial. One of the major disadvantages of CAS is a high incidence of cerebral embolism. Recent reports described that there was an association between specific plaque components evaluated by preoperative examinations and an increased number of emboli after CAS, 6,7 and that multispectral MRI could identify plaque constituents, such as the necrotic core and intraplaque hemorrhage, with high sensitivity and specificity. 8,9 However, this examination requiring high-resolution MRI is not always available before revascularization procedures. Establishing a simple method to discriminate plaques at high risk for cerebral embolism during CAS on preoperative routine examination is important. We focused on high-intensity signal (HIS) in the plaque on time-of-flight (TOF) MRA performed for screening. The aims of this study were to validate HIS in the plaque on TOF-MRA with histology in CEA patients and t...