2018
DOI: 10.1037/spq0000232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

At what cost? Examining the cost effectiveness of a universal social–emotional learning program.

Abstract: Although implementation of universal social-emotional learning programs is becoming more common in schools, few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of such programs. As such, the purpose of this article is two fold. First, we provide an overview of cost-effectiveness methods for school-based programs, and second, we share results of a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of a universal social-emotional learning (SEL) program, the Social Skills Improvement System-Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there may be limited financial (Forman et al, 2009) and personnel (Mihalic & Irwin, 2003) resources to support implementation. Indeed, costs of manualized SEL programs generally include materials and equipment, training, teacher time, and lost academic instructional time (Hunter, DiPerna, Hart, & Crowley, 2018). At the individual level, school counselors and teachers may view implementing lengthy SEL programs as outside of the scope of their role or may cite inadequate time in the day to implement such programs (Forman et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there may be limited financial (Forman et al, 2009) and personnel (Mihalic & Irwin, 2003) resources to support implementation. Indeed, costs of manualized SEL programs generally include materials and equipment, training, teacher time, and lost academic instructional time (Hunter, DiPerna, Hart, & Crowley, 2018). At the individual level, school counselors and teachers may view implementing lengthy SEL programs as outside of the scope of their role or may cite inadequate time in the day to implement such programs (Forman et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students participating in the current study were exposed to the SSIS-CIP for a relatively brief amount of time (approximately 10–12 hours over 12 weeks) at a cost of approximately $19 per student (see Hunter et al, 2018), whereas some other programs require a much larger resource investment. It is possible that the SSIS-CIP lacked sufficient dosage to substantially move the needle on student achievement; however, the state test results observed in this study (all but one positive effect size) and relatively small amount of instructional time required for implementation may be seen as acceptable to stakeholders given its efficacy in improving social behavior in the classroom (e.g., DiPerna et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the finite instructional time present in a school day, this fear may not be unfounded; teaching SEL requires replacing time that would otherwise be spent on a different type of instruction or activity. In this way, a “lost opportunity cost” (i.e., benefit that is missed when a specific program is implemented) of universal SEL may be that students receive less academic instruction (Hunter et al, 2018; Levin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Universal Sel and State Test Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empathy-focused arts programming that uses visual arts methods can easily be administered in low-or under-resourced schools or after-school settings, even through remote means. Facilitating access to creative SEL programming is an absolute must, especially considering that SEL curricula tend to be costly, averaging approximately $6000 per program (Hunter et al, 2018).…”
Section: Rationale For Empathy-focused Arts Programming For Early Elementary-aged Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%