2014
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2014.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

At the brink of supercoloniality: genetic, behavioral, and chemical assessments of population structure of the desert ant Cataglyphis niger

Abstract: † These authors have contributed equally to this work.The nesting habits of ants play an important role in structuring ant populations. They vary from monodomy, a colony occupies a single nest, via polydomy, a colony occupies multiple adjacent nests, to supercoloniality, a colony spans over large territories comprising dozen to thousands nests without having any boundaries. The population structure of the desert ant Cataglyphis niger, previously considered to form supercolonies, was studied using genetic, chem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the most probable population structure of C. israelensis along the coastline of Atlit is that of polydomy, with each colony consisting in one main nest, in which the single queen is located, and featuring several additional satellite nests, apparently queenless. This population structure seems to be very common in this genus and habitat, especially in the bicolor group ( C. savignyi ; Saar et al, , C. drusus; unpublished data). The basis for such population structure could be due to difficulty of dispersal, properties of the substrate, and/or richness of the habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In conclusion, the most probable population structure of C. israelensis along the coastline of Atlit is that of polydomy, with each colony consisting in one main nest, in which the single queen is located, and featuring several additional satellite nests, apparently queenless. This population structure seems to be very common in this genus and habitat, especially in the bicolor group ( C. savignyi ; Saar et al, , C. drusus; unpublished data). The basis for such population structure could be due to difficulty of dispersal, properties of the substrate, and/or richness of the habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Genetic (microsatellites) analysis was performed on 348 workers from the Atlit population (12*29 nests) and 72 workers (12*6 nests) from the Habonim population. DNA was extracted with 5% CHELEX (BIO‐RAD) and amplified with eight microsatellite markers that had been designed previously for C. hispanica (Ch23, Ch08, Ch01, Ch10, Ch11 (Darras, et al, )), C. cursor (Cc99, Cc54 (Pearcy, Clémencet, Chameron, Aron, & Doums, ), and C. niger (Cn02 (Saar et al, ) using Type‐it PCR mix (QIAGEN). PCR products were sequenced by ABI3500 sequencer, and genotypes were then visualized with GeneMarker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the coexistence of several queens within colonies). Polygyny in Cataglyphis is rather rare with only three documented cases: C. mauritanica and C. velox in the C. altisquamis group (Eyer et al ., ,b) and C. niger in the C. bicolor group (Leniaud et al ., ; Saar et al ., ). In the C. altisquamis group, nestmate queens are positively related, consistent with parthenogenetic production of new queens (Eyer et al ., ,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queens with medium to full oocytes in each ovariole were classified as reproductive queens (Figure S1). DNA was extracted with 5% CHELEX ( BIO‐RAD ) and amplified with 7 microsatellite markers that had been previously designed for C. hispanica (Ch23; Darras, Kuhn, & Aron, ), C. cursor (Cc51, Cc89, and Cc99; Pearcy, Clemencet, Chameron, Aron, & Doums, ), and C. niger (Cn02, Cn04, and Cn08; Saar, Leniaud, Aron, & Hefetz, ) using Type‐it PCR mix (QIAGEN). PCR products were sequenced by ABI3500 genetic analyzer, and genotype analyses were performed with GeneMarker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%