2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00546.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

At HOME in Scotland: validation of the home observation for measurement of the environment inventory

Abstract: This Scottish sample had similar MC-HOME and EA-HOME scores as previously reported in American samples and the HOME scores related strongly to family adversity, supplying a proximal link between social conditions and the environment of children. These results suggest that the HOME Inventory is reliable and has concurrent validity with measures of social adversity in a British sample.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MC-HOME are consistent with studies on the IT-HOME and the EC-HOME Burston, Puckering, & Kearney, 2005;Han et al, 2004). The internal consistency of the MC-HOME subscales in a U.S. sample ranged from .52 to .80 and was found to be .90 for the total scale.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…MC-HOME are consistent with studies on the IT-HOME and the EC-HOME Burston, Puckering, & Kearney, 2005;Han et al, 2004). The internal consistency of the MC-HOME subscales in a U.S. sample ranged from .52 to .80 and was found to be .90 for the total scale.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The HOME tool is generally considered to have good interrater reliability (Burston et al 2005) with an inter-observer agreement level of 80-90% (Totsika & Sylva 2004). This study showed an agreement level of 73-100% between the telephone HOME and the original HOME.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It is a further strength of the study that such a large sample was used (n = 77), with a greater sample size than the previous Irish study (n = 35) (Mulligan et al 2013) or the Scottish study (n = 27) (Burston et al 2005). It is a further strength of the study that such a large sample was used (n = 77), with a greater sample size than the previous Irish study (n = 35) (Mulligan et al 2013) or the Scottish study (n = 27) (Burston et al 2005).…”
Section: Strengths Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[28][29][30] Higher scores are more favorable, with low scores representing an impoverished environment. Interrater reliability and Cronbach's ␣ have both been reported to be .92.…”
Section: Home Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%