2014
DOI: 10.1086/677261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asynchrony of Seasons: Genetic Differentiation Associated with Geographic Variation in Climatic Seasonality and Reproductive Phenology

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. abstract: Many organisms exhibit distinct breeding seasons tracking food availability. If conspecific populations inhabit areas that experience different temporal cycles in fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(112 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons across species show that the level of genetic structuring varies from deep phylogeographic breaks to unstructured panmictic populations [2]. This among-species variation in the amount and depth of phylogeographic structuring has been attributed to various factors, including differences in dispersal ability [3,4], habitat preferences [5], breeding phenology [6], life history traits [7], and the amount of evolutionary time in the landscape [8,9]. Because comparative phylogeographic studies usually examine species that occur within the same geographic region and in similar environmental and historical settings, the generality of associations between species traits and phylogeographic variation is largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons across species show that the level of genetic structuring varies from deep phylogeographic breaks to unstructured panmictic populations [2]. This among-species variation in the amount and depth of phylogeographic structuring has been attributed to various factors, including differences in dispersal ability [3,4], habitat preferences [5], breeding phenology [6], life history traits [7], and the amount of evolutionary time in the landscape [8,9]. Because comparative phylogeographic studies usually examine species that occur within the same geographic region and in similar environmental and historical settings, the generality of associations between species traits and phylogeographic variation is largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrush offers exciting opportunities for future study. For example, information in sound collections may allow one to assess the effect of climate on singing behavior within and 457 across sites; because singing correlates with reproduction, information in sound 458 collections may further be used as a proxy to examine geographic variation in breeding 459 activity and its consequences for population differentiation (Quintero et al 2014). In the 460 long term, sound recordings in collections may allow one to monitor changes in vocal 461 activity patterns and annual phenological cycles in wild bird populations in relation to 462 local and global change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological evidence shows that the NAMS has been in effect since at least 6.3 Ma and its influence on precipitation disparity between Mojave and Sonoran deserts has been operating during the period when 20 of the 25 species diverged. Precipitation asynchrony has been shown to drive genetic divergence in New World birds (Quintero, González‐Caro, Zalamea, & Cadena, ), and Mojave‐Sonoran precipitation asynchrony could initiate differences in behaviour, mating patterns, energy balance and osmotic regulation (Barrows, ; Davis & DeNardo, , ). For example, the Mojave and Sonoran desert tortoises exhibit differences in timing of activity, foraging and reproduction that coincide with seasonal precipitation differences (Esque, Drake, & Nussear, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%