2017
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arx055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asynchronous hatching in a nonavian species: a test of the hurry-up hypothesis

Abstract: Running title: Hurry-up hypothesis 10 2 The hurry-up hypothesis suggests that completing reproduction as soon as possible is favoured when the quantity or quality of resources used for breeding declines over time.However, completing reproduction sooner may incur a cost if it leads to an asynchronous hatching pattern that reduces overall growth and survival of offspring.Here, we present the first test of the hurry-up hypothesis in a non-avian system, the 15 burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, which breeds … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative explanation for why we found no evidence for differential hormonal deposition in eggs in response to male presence and carcass size is that females may adjust their allocation in response to other key factors indicating the conditions experienced by offspring after hatching, such as temperature (Grew et al, 2019) or carcass decomposition (Ford and Smiseth, 2017). This suggestion is supported by the observation that most of the estimated variation in JH and ESH concentrations remains unexplained in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative explanation for why we found no evidence for differential hormonal deposition in eggs in response to male presence and carcass size is that females may adjust their allocation in response to other key factors indicating the conditions experienced by offspring after hatching, such as temperature (Grew et al, 2019) or carcass decomposition (Ford and Smiseth, 2017). This suggestion is supported by the observation that most of the estimated variation in JH and ESH concentrations remains unexplained in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This species is well suited to investigate this hypothesis as it exhibits offspring begging and biparental food provisioning after hatching (Eggert and Müller, 1997;Scott, 1998). Females only mature their oocytes once they encounter the carcass of a small vertebrate (Scott and Traniello, 1987), and females start laying eggs 3-28 hours after encountering a carcass (Ford and Smiseth, 2017). Given that egg production starts after females encounter a carcass, females might adjust the deposition of hormones into their eggs based on various prenatal environmental cues that may predict the amount of food available to offspring after hatching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this species, offspring suffer significant fitness costs across their life cycle when either the offspring themselves or their mothers are inbred (Mattey et al ., ; Pilakouta et al ., , ; Pilakouta & Smiseth, ). Nicrophorus vespilloides is an excellent system to study the effects of inbreeding on egg size and egg laying because the eggs can be measured accurately and the timing of egg laying can be reliably recorded (Ford & Smiseth, , ). This species breeds on small vertebrate carcasses, which are buried underground (Scott, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to breed again, females must first remain with the current brood until larvae complete their development, which would take about 7 days (Smiseth et al, 2003;. They then need to search for and secure a new carcass, which are thought to be rare (Scott, 1998), and produce eggs and care for the new brood, which would take another 10 days (Ford & Smiseth, 2017). An alternative explanation for our results is that infected females perceived their chance to survive and reproduce again to be very low, and that they therefore maintained a high level of care as a terminal investment response (Williams, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%