Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-014-2114-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotics of the Eta Invariant

Abstract: We prove an asymptotic bound on the eta invariant of a family of coupled Dirac operators on an odd dimensional manifold. In the case when the manifold is the unit circle bundle of a positive line bundle over a complex manifold, we obtain precise formulas for the eta invariant.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove a stronger bound of this kind than any previous bound, see Proposition 6 and the discussion about the eta invariant below, and this is the key point which allows us to prove Opgr Q pσ j qq 2{5 asymptotics. Spectral flow bounds for families of Dirac operators were also considered in [20,21,26]. The main difference here is that in those works the bounds were proved on reducible solutions where the connections needed to define the relevant Dirac operators were explicitly given.…”
Section: Idea Of the Proof And Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prove a stronger bound of this kind than any previous bound, see Proposition 6 and the discussion about the eta invariant below, and this is the key point which allows us to prove Opgr Q pσ j qq 2{5 asymptotics. Spectral flow bounds for families of Dirac operators were also considered in [20,21,26]. The main difference here is that in those works the bounds were proved on reducible solutions where the connections needed to define the relevant Dirac operators were explicitly given.…”
Section: Idea Of the Proof And Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Savale [13] improved this theorem by showing that the subleading order term is of O(r 3 2 ).…”
Section: Dirac Spectral Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The reason that we can not improve upon gr Q asymptotics is because we do not know how to strengthen the O r 3/2 spectral flow estimate on the irreducible solutions of Propositions 5 or 8. A better O(r ) estimate does however exist [35,37] for reducible solutions for which one understands the connection precisely in the limit r → ∞. However, the a priori estimates (3.23) are not strong enough to carry out the same for irreducibles.…”
Section: Remark 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prove a stronger bound of this kind than any previous bound, see Proposition 5 and the discussion about the eta invariant below, and this is the key point which allows us to prove O j 2/5 asymptotics. Spectral flow bounds for families of Dirac operators were also considered in [34][35][36]42]. The main difference here is that in those works the bounds were proved on reducible solutions where the connections needed to define the relevant Dirac operators were explicitly given.…”
Section: Idea Of the Proof And Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%