2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-021-04154-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotics of $$\mathrm {SL}(2,{{\mathbb {C}}})$$ coherent invariant tensors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has more complicated critical point equations, and a richer geometric interpretation. In the simplest case of a product of generalized Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, with no graph structure, the critical point equations define a more elaborated map between the 3d vectors appearing in the boundary data and bivectors than the one appearing here: γ-simple bivectors instead of bivectors with vanishing magnetic part [66]. For a tensor invariant associated to a graph, it should be possible to combine the technique presented here with the ones of [66] to obtain asymptotics of all unitary SL(2, C) invariants on graphs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has more complicated critical point equations, and a richer geometric interpretation. In the simplest case of a product of generalized Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, with no graph structure, the critical point equations define a more elaborated map between the 3d vectors appearing in the boundary data and bivectors than the one appearing here: γ-simple bivectors instead of bivectors with vanishing magnetic part [66]. For a tensor invariant associated to a graph, it should be possible to combine the technique presented here with the ones of [66] to obtain asymptotics of all unitary SL(2, C) invariants on graphs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest case of a product of generalized Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, with no graph structure, the critical point equations define a more elaborated map between the 3d vectors appearing in the boundary data and bivectors than the one appearing here: γ-simple bivectors instead of bivectors with vanishing magnetic part [66]. For a tensor invariant associated to a graph, it should be possible to combine the technique presented here with the ones of [66] to obtain asymptotics of all unitary SL(2, C) invariants on graphs. Secondly, it would be also interesting to extend our technique to more general settings with time-like or null faces, which involve the other little groups of SL(2, C) and typically use their associated representation basis instead of the canonical basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The booster functions were first introduced in [31], numerically computed in [12,32], analytically evaluated in terms of complex gamma functions [33,34], and they have an interesting geometrical interpretation in terms of boosted tetrahedra [35]. The booster functions encode how the EPRL model imposes the quantum simplicity constraints and depend on the Immirzi parameter γ.…”
Section: How-to Compute the Eprl Vertex Amplitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The booster functions were first introduced in [34], numerically computed in [12,35], analytically evaluated in terms of complex gamma functions [36,37], and they have an interesting geometrical interpretation in terms of boosted tetrahedra [38]. The booster functions encode how the EPRL model imposes the quantum simplicity constraints and depend on the Immirzi parameter γ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%