2009
DOI: 10.1515/forum.2009.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotics of class numbers for progressions and for fundamental discriminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of the last statement is analogous to the proof of the first statement when we use (20) and Lemma 2.…”
Section: éTienne Fouvry and Jürgen Klünersmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of the last statement is analogous to the proof of the first statement when we use (20) and Lemma 2.…”
Section: éTienne Fouvry and Jürgen Klünersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One can summarize Sarnak's result in saying that H(d) and d have the same order of magnitude, when one uses the ordering by the size of d . (For a generalization and a transposition of the results of [21] to the case of arithmetic progressions and of fundamental discriminants, see [20]). In [22, Conjecture 1], Sarnak also proposes a conjecture to guess the statistical size of h(D) with D fundamental.…”
Section: Applications To the Class Number Of Real Quadratic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can obtain similar results for the corresponding moments of class numbers over fundamental discriminants, by using the techniques of this paper together with [11]. Note that when d is fundamental, h(d) is the narrow class number of the real quadratic field Q( √ d), which equals the class number of Q( √ d) if the negative Pell equation t 2 − du 2 = −4 is solvable, and equals twice this class number if the negative Pell equation is not solvable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…We shall prove that summing over d ∈ D such that ε d ≤ x amounts to essentially summing over the corresponding pairs (t, u) in a certain range. This follows from the arguments in [13] and was used by Raulf [11] to compute the first moment of class numbers over fundamental discriminants. Here and throughout we define…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lemma 2.11 and 2.19 in [16], we see that The following lemma describes the values in Lemma 3.5 for ΓΓ(p r ) = SL 2 (Z).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 90%