1975
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160280406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotics for the wiener sausage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

10
401
1
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 506 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
10
401
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, if the diffusion constants of the A and B particles are the same, one can also view ρ A (t) as the fraction of particles that have not met any other particles. Thus the reaction A+ B → ∅ in the limit of a low density of A particles has been discussed under the guises of uninfected walkers [17] in which random walkers infect each other on contact, diffusion in the presence of traps [16,18] in which the B particles are considered as traps for the A particles, and predator-prey models [19] in which one asks for the survival of a prey (the A particle) being 'chased' by diffusing predators (the B particles). To avoid confusion, we shall adopt only the trapping terminology in our discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if the diffusion constants of the A and B particles are the same, one can also view ρ A (t) as the fraction of particles that have not met any other particles. Thus the reaction A+ B → ∅ in the limit of a low density of A particles has been discussed under the guises of uninfected walkers [17] in which random walkers infect each other on contact, diffusion in the presence of traps [16,18] in which the B particles are considered as traps for the A particles, and predator-prey models [19] in which one asks for the survival of a prey (the A particle) being 'chased' by diffusing predators (the B particles). To avoid confusion, we shall adopt only the trapping terminology in our discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convincing arguments for the validity of Lifshitz' conjecture were given by Friedberg and Luttinger [18], [32]. Its rigorous proof [15], [36], [37] relies on Donsker's and Varadhan's involved large-deviation results [15], [14,Section 4.3] about the long-time asymptotics of certain Wiener integrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…02.50Ey, Trapping A+B → B and recombination A+B → 0 reactions (TR and RR) involving randomly moving A and B particles which react "when they meet" at a certain distance b are ubiquitous in nature. A few stray examples include quenching of delocalized excitations, coagulation, recombination of radicals, charge carriers or defects, or biological processes related to population survival [1].In recent years there has been much interest in the long-time behavior of these processes, following a remarkable discovery [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] of many-particle effects, which induce essential departures from the conventionally expected behavior [1].A pronounced deviation from the text-book predictions was found for the diffusion-controlled RR in case when initially the particles of the A and B species are all distributed at random with strictly equal mean densities n 0 . It has been first shown [2] and subsequently proven [3,4] that as t → ∞ the mean density n(t) follows …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is intimately related to many fundamenal problems of statistical physics [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Survival probability P target (t) of an immobile target A of radius b in presence of point-like diffusive traps B (TAP) can be calculated exactly for any d (see Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%