2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2023.3244885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DI is a more straightforward method of state preparation, which entails loading the CI vectors of each individual fragment onto fragment circuits of size N frag , where N frag represents the number of spin orbitals in each fragment’s active space. Improving these initialization algorithms is an ongoing field of research, with multiple methods of circuit synthesis, with their cost still lower-bounded by an exponential-scaling number of CNOTs. The DI method used in this work, as implemented in Qiskit, involves the use of quantum multiplexors to generate an arbitrary n -qubit quantum state. This is done by resetting the fragment qubits to |0⟩ and subsequently applying combinations of one- and two-qubit gates.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DI is a more straightforward method of state preparation, which entails loading the CI vectors of each individual fragment onto fragment circuits of size N frag , where N frag represents the number of spin orbitals in each fragment’s active space. Improving these initialization algorithms is an ongoing field of research, with multiple methods of circuit synthesis, with their cost still lower-bounded by an exponential-scaling number of CNOTs. The DI method used in this work, as implemented in Qiskit, involves the use of quantum multiplexors to generate an arbitrary n -qubit quantum state. This is done by resetting the fragment qubits to |0⟩ and subsequently applying combinations of one- and two-qubit gates.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the database of hit-pattern templates would be loaded onto the device from Quantum Random-Access Memory (QRAM; Giovannetti et al, 2008 ), however limitations on the ability to realize QRAM mean that, currently, the database must be prepared via state preparation. State preparation is a highly non-trivial task, and has been shown to necessitate exponential circuit depths to construct an arbitrary quantum state (Sun et al, 2023 ). By leveraging ancillary qubits, this scaling can be reduced to polynomial scaling in circuit depth, though at the potential cost of an exponentially growing number of ancillary qubits (Plesch and Brukner, 2011 ; Zhang et al, 2021 , 2022 ; Rosenthal, 2023 ).…”
Section: Quantum Template Matching For Track Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This state can be generated using poly(ℓ(x)) gates, where poly(ℓ(x)) indicates a term at most polynomial in ℓ(x). This follows since the encoding of x to |x⟩ needs O(ℓ(x)) gates [25], [26] and unitary U ℓ(x) uses poly(ℓ(x)) gates by definition. Next, note that the empirical mean deviates from the expected value ⟨x| U…”
Section: A F (X) Is Quantum 1-computablementioning
confidence: 99%