2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotically optimal amplifiers for the Moran process

Abstract: We study the Moran process as adapted by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak. This is a model of an evolving population on a graph or digraph where certain individuals, called "mutants" have fitness r and other individuals, called "non-mutants" have fitness 1. We focus on the situation where the mutation is advantageous, in the sense that r > 1. A family of digraphs is said to be strongly amplifying if the extinction probability tends to 0 when the Moran process is run on digraphs in this family. The most-amplifying k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Bd Moran process, various results on amplifiers exist. The Star graph is a prominent example of a graph that is a quadratic amplifier for any r > 1 [24,25,27,26,28] and there exist super amplifiers, that is, families of graphs that guarantee fixation in the limit of large population size, for any fixed r > 1 [16,29,30,31,32]. Furthermore, computer simulations on small populations have shown that many small graphs have amplifying properties [33,34,35].…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Bd Moran process, various results on amplifiers exist. The Star graph is a prominent example of a graph that is a quadratic amplifier for any r > 1 [24,25,27,26,28] and there exist super amplifiers, that is, families of graphs that guarantee fixation in the limit of large population size, for any fixed r > 1 [16,29,30,31,32]. Furthermore, computer simulations on small populations have shown that many small graphs have amplifying properties [33,34,35].…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 1.2, we alluded to the fact that the problem of finding the strongest possible amplifier had essentially been solved. Any directed graph has extinction probability Ω(n −1∕2 ) [13], which is tight up to a polylogarithmic factor [11], and any undirected graph has extinction probability Ω(n −1∕3 ), which is tight up to a constant factor [13]. In fact, the results of [13] generalize to sparse graphs; any m-edge undirected graph has extinction probability Ω(max{n −1∕3 , n∕m}), which is also tight up to a constant factor.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is natural to ask: how strong can an n ‐vertex amplifier or suppressor be? For amplifiers this problem has essentially been solved for both directed and undirected graphs ; see Section 1.4 for details. For suppressors, much less is known; to our knowledge, the strongest family of (both directed and undirected) suppressors in the literature is due to Giakkoupis , and has fixation probability Ofalse(nprefix−1false/4lognfalse).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…families of graphs with fixation probability tending to 1 or to 0 respectively as the order of the graph tends to infinity and for r > 1. Galanis et al [4] find an infinite family of strongly-amplifying directed graphs, namely the "megastar" with fixation probability 1 − O(n −1/2 log 23 n), which was later proved to be optimal up to logarithmic factors [6].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%