1976
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176343644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Location for a Symmetric Stable Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that a way of estimating a parameter for i.i.d. variables X j is to use the empirical characteristic function j ∈J exp(iwX j ), or j ∈J cos(wX j ) in the symmetrical case, for some given w (or several w's at once), where J is the index set; in the Lévy process setting, see, for example, [8,10,18,19] and Chapter 4 in [23].…”
Section: Example: the Empirical Characteristic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that a way of estimating a parameter for i.i.d. variables X j is to use the empirical characteristic function j ∈J exp(iwX j ), or j ∈J cos(wX j ) in the symmetrical case, for some given w (or several w's at once), where J is the index set; in the Lévy process setting, see, for example, [8,10,18,19] and Chapter 4 in [23].…”
Section: Example: the Empirical Characteristic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, further, this variable has a density which depends smoothly on the parameter of interest, η, the Fisher information at stage n has the form I n, (η) = nI (η), where I (η) > 0 is the Fisher information of the model based on the observation of the single variable X , we have the LAN property with rate √ n, the asymptotically efficient estimators η n are those for which √ n( η n − η) converges in law to the normal distribution N(0, I (η) −1 ) and the MLE solves the problem (see, e.g., [5][6][7]). In this setting, a variety of other methods have been proposed in the literature: using the empirical characteristic function as an estimating equation (see, e.g., [8,10,18,19] and Chapter 4 in [23]), maximum likelihood by Fourier inversion of the characteristic function (see [9]), a regression based on the explicit form of the characteristic function (see [14]) or other numerical approximations (see [16,17]). Some of these methods were compared in [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only way to draw inference is to use the fact that the increments form independent realizations of infinitely divisible probability distributions. In this setting, a variety of methods have been proposed in the literature: standard maximum likelihood estimation DuMouchel (1973aDuMouchel ( , 1973bDuMouchel ( , 1975, using the empirical characteristic function as an estimating equation [see, e.g., Press (1972), Fenech (1976), Feuerverger and McDunnough (1981a), Singleton (2001)], maximum likelihood by Fourier inversion of the characteristic function Feuerverger and McDunnough (1981b), a regression based on the explicit form of the characteristic function Koutrouvelis (1980) or other numerical approximations Nolan (1997). Some of these methods were compared in Akgiray and Lamoureux (1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%