2016
DOI: 10.3233/asy-151336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic study for Stokes–Brinkman model with jump embedded transmission conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of pore-scale modeling, this formulation take into account both the fluid region inside the pores and the (small) porosity of the surrounding matrix: it is a two-scale model. Furthermore, such a term can be used as a penalization technique in order to satisfy a no-slip condition at the fluid/solid interface [48,3], by choosing a value of ε that is as small as possible (given the robustness of the numerical method used, since the problem becomes stiffer as ε decreases).…”
Section: Superficial Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of pore-scale modeling, this formulation take into account both the fluid region inside the pores and the (small) porosity of the surrounding matrix: it is a two-scale model. Furthermore, such a term can be used as a penalization technique in order to satisfy a no-slip condition at the fluid/solid interface [48,3], by choosing a value of ε that is as small as possible (given the robustness of the numerical method used, since the problem becomes stiffer as ε decreases).…”
Section: Superficial Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), while volume reactions allow most of the usual numerical methods (including LBM [58,27], FV [51] and SPH [7]) but require clever modeling of surfacelocalized phenomena. Volume based modeling using structured meshes can involve crude no-slip conditions fusing penalization techniques [3,16], but nowadays two-scale models are suitably formalized [42,38,51], allowing greater physical involvement of the rock matrix in the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17]) the solution to the limit problem (3.11) can be view as the zeroth order exterior expansion and is used to approximate the solution outside the boundary layer. Similar singular perturbation problem involving Stokes-Brinkman interface model has been studied in [5] where the author compute boundary layer corrector as well as the complete asymptotic expansion. Nevertheless, this paper aims at using the model (2.3) for topology optimization to be able to look for optimal design that are porous medium.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20]). For instance the Brinkman model [5] involves a second order term, with an effective viscosity, in the porous medium and can be used to account high porosity of the porous media. Another example is the Forchheimer model [14] whose model involves an additional non-linear term inside the porous media to deal with microscopic inertial effects.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ratio of pore size to the macroscopic length scale as a small parameter, the dominant jump conditions are found at the first order, and the generality of such asymptotic analysis allows them to make direct comparison with several pre-existing models such as the pioneering slip model by Beavers and Joseph 21 . It is worth mentioning that the approach adopted by Angot et al [22][23][24] was suggested by Worster et al 25,26 , where the empirical formula for the jump boundary conditions is similar to those used and/or derived in many other works [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%