2011
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2011)113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic $ \mathcal{W} $ -symmetries in three-dimensional higher-spin gauge theories

Abstract: We discuss how to systematically compute the asymptotic symmetry algebras of generic three-dimensional bosonic higher-spin gauge theories in backgrounds that are asymptotically AdS. We apply these techniques to a one-parameter family of higher-spin gauge theories that can be considered as large N limits of SL(N) × SL(N) Chern-Simons theories, and we provide a closed formula for the structure constants of the resulting infinitedimensional non-linear W-algebras. Along the way we provide a closed formula for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
334
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(293 reference statements)
7
334
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Moreover, the hypergeometric function admits another simple expression, Notice that the equations (4.20) and (4.22) are the defining relations of the deformed oscillators, and one can see thatν is a constant diagonal matrix: 23) and can be treated as a constant numberν = 2 λ ± 1 in the ± eigenspace ofk.…”
Section: Jhep05(2014)103mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Moreover, the hypergeometric function admits another simple expression, Notice that the equations (4.20) and (4.22) are the defining relations of the deformed oscillators, and one can see thatν is a constant diagonal matrix: 23) and can be treated as a constant numberν = 2 λ ± 1 in the ± eigenspace ofk.…”
Section: Jhep05(2014)103mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The precise map beyond low spins is subject to some ambiguities that have yet to be resolved [38].) An important point is that we always demand that our theory contain a metric.…”
Section: Jhep05(2014)052mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, by using the fifth equation of (C.1) with spin Let us focus on the 1 (z−w) 4 terms in the operator product expansion of W (z)W (w) where the spin 2 current W (z) is the first component of W (Z) in (2.19) that has the form in (2.24) together with (F.1). One determines the overall constant A(k) 25) by requiring that the 1 (z−w) 4 term should be equal to c 2 where the central charge is 10 Totally, there are 249 independent terms if we expand out the structure constants(the number of nonzero structure constants is 492 from the discussion of the Appendix E) and the metric.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%