2006
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic invariants of base loci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
198
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This notation was established in [4] for projective varieties, but we will use it in a slightly more general setting; see for example [11]. A log pair (X, ∆) is a normal variety X and an R-Weil divisor ∆ ≥ 0 such that K X +∆ is R-Cartier.…”
Section: B(d + A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notation was established in [4] for projective varieties, but we will use it in a slightly more general setting; see for example [11]. A log pair (X, ∆) is a normal variety X and an R-Weil divisor ∆ ≥ 0 such that K X +∆ is R-Cartier.…”
Section: B(d + A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By choosing H sufficiently small, we may assume that H = εA−H is ample. Therefore, we may assume that the pair (X, B + See [8,7,14,20], etc for more details on the non-ample and non-nef loci.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is checked in [13] that B − (L) ⊂ B R (L) and that the diminished base locus only depends on the numerical class of L. In some sense the diminished base locus measures the failure of L to be nef.…”
Section: R-divisorsmentioning
confidence: 99%