2016
DOI: 10.46298/dmtcs.1302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic Density of Zimin Words

Abstract: Word $W$ is an instance of word $V$ provided there is a homomorphism $\phi$ mapping letters to nonempty words so that $\phi(V) = W$. For example, taking $\phi$ such that $\phi(c)=fr$, $\phi(o)=e$ and $\phi(l)=zer$, we see that "freezer" is an instance of "cool". Let $\mathbb{I}_n(V,[q])$ be the probability that a random length $n$ word on the alphabet $[q] = \{1,2,\cdots q\}$ is an instance of $V$. Having previously shown that $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \mathbb{I}_n(V,[q])$ exists, we now calculate this li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our lower bound on g is not as good as the one obtained by combining Theorem 9 with Corollary 2 but its proof seems more direct (already more direct than the proof of Theorem 9 itself). The proof follows a similar strategy as the (slightly better) doubly-exponential lower bound for f from [5], but again, seems to be more direct. Our novel contribution is to provide a doubly-exponential upper bound on g in Section 5.2.…”
Section: End Of the Proof Of Claimmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our lower bound on g is not as good as the one obtained by combining Theorem 9 with Corollary 2 but its proof seems more direct (already more direct than the proof of Theorem 9 itself). The proof follows a similar strategy as the (slightly better) doubly-exponential lower bound for f from [5], but again, seems to be more direct. Our novel contribution is to provide a doubly-exponential upper bound on g in Section 5.2.…”
Section: End Of the Proof Of Claimmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Computing the exact value of f (n, k) for n ≥ 1 and k ≥ 2, or at least giving upper and lower bounds on its value, has been the topic of several articles in recent years [5,21,15,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations