2016
DOI: 10.3233/com-150035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic density and the coarse computability bound

Abstract: Abstract. For r ∈ [0, 1] we say that a set A ⊆ ω is coarsely computable at density r if there is a computable set C such that {n : C(n) = A(n)} has lower density at least r. Let γ(A) = sup{r : A is coarsely computable at density r}. We study the interactions of these concepts with Turing reducibility. For example, we show that if r ∈ (0, 1] there are sets A 0 , A 1 such that γ(A 0 ) = γ(A 1 ) = r where A 0 is coarsely computable at density r while A 1 is not coarsely computable at density r. We show that a rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the next result, we will use the following lemma from [9]. Let J k be the interval [2 k − 1, 2 k+1 − 1).…”
Section: Measure Upper Cones and Minimal Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the next result, we will use the following lemma from [9]. Let J k be the interval [2 k − 1, 2 k+1 − 1).…”
Section: Measure Upper Cones and Minimal Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generic computability and coarse computability, which have played significant roles in several recent papers such as [1,2,3,5,6,8,9,10,11,13], both capture the idea of computing a function on "almost all" inputs, where "almost all" is defined in terms of asymptotic density. The difference between the two notions is that generic computability permits errors of omission (i.e., divergent computations), while coarse computability permits errors of commission (i.e., incorrect answers).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy with partial computability at densities less than 1, Hirschfeldt, Jockusch, McNicholl and Schupp [16] introduced the analogous concepts for coarse computability. We define A▽C = {n : A(n) = C(n)} and call A▽C the symmetric agreement of A and C. Of course, the symmetric agreement of A and C is the complement of the symmetric difference of A and C. The coarse computability bound of every 1-random set A is 1/2.…”
Section: Computability At Densities Less Thanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work may be contrasted with recent results on bounds for coarse computability (Cf., e.g., ). In coarse computability one asks about the (lower or upper) densities of {n:f(n)=A(n)} where f is a computable function and A may be arbitrary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%