1998
DOI: 10.14492/hokmj/1351001287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic behavior of solutions to a crystalline flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result is proved for crystalline flow by [St1], [St2]. So it is likely that the value of M (⃗ n)/γ(−⃗ n) on N plays an important role to determine the fully faceted shape.…”
Section: Remark 32 (I) Unlesssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A similar result is proved for crystalline flow by [St1], [St2]. So it is likely that the value of M (⃗ n)/γ(−⃗ n) on N plays an important role to determine the fully faceted shape.…”
Section: Remark 32 (I) Unlesssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In fact there exists a self-similar shrinking solution for smooth strictly convex γ: [Ga], [GaL], [DG], [DGM]. It is extended to a planar crystalline flow by [St1], [St2] and to a crystalline flow in R 3 by [PP]. Note that if βγ = const, it is clear that the Wulff shape of γ always shrinks self-similarly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a polygon will shrink to a point by such a deformation, a sequence of its properly normalized shapes will converge in the Hausdorff metric to the solution of the polygonal L 0 -Minkowski problem. This asymptotic behavior has been studied in a different context [13], where our former argument works in the case (i) of Theorem 1.1. The method presented here is different and simpler.…”
Section: Has a Solution If And Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also, independently, defined and studied by Taylor [14], for a particular set C. The flow is well defined as all the sides of the evolving polygon become of zero length simultaneously, at finite time T [14]. It should also be noted that the shape of evolving polygons is independent on the choice of the origin [13], thus we may assume, without any loss of generality, that the origin is the shrinking point K(T). An immediate consequence is the strict positivity of the support numbers to the sides of the boundary "K(t) for t < T. For any other choice of the origin, the support numbers, h i (t), will become signed distances according to the definition…”
Section: The Crystalline Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%