2001
DOI: 10.1007/s007010170025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptomatic Vertebral Artery Injury after Acute Cervical Spine Trauma

Abstract: Two recent cases of vertebral artery injury from cervical fracture-dislocation prompted us to review the literature of these wrongly thought uncommon lesions. Extracranial vertebral artery injury during cervical trauma needs to be suspected not only in the case of vertebrobasilar ischemia, but also in asymptomatic patients presenting serious flexion-distraction deformities. Fracture of a transverse foramen or facet joint dislocation should alert the clinician. Magnetic resonance evaluates blood flow and vessel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,20,21 On the other hand, slow blood flow in the small vessels on MRA can be confused with occlusion as a result of insufficient resolution. 5,22 Although conventional angiography is a much more invasive modality, it is superior to MRA in the detection of nonoccluded intimal disruption, which occasionally causes distal embolization. However, because occlusion is the most common vertebral artery injury, the majority can be successfully detected by noninvasive MRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,20,21 On the other hand, slow blood flow in the small vessels on MRA can be confused with occlusion as a result of insufficient resolution. 5,22 Although conventional angiography is a much more invasive modality, it is superior to MRA in the detection of nonoccluded intimal disruption, which occasionally causes distal embolization. However, because occlusion is the most common vertebral artery injury, the majority can be successfully detected by noninvasive MRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effects of CVI can be variable, the adult literature demonstrates that many patients with unilateral CVI remain asymptomatic, 18 with only 12% to 20% of unilateral CVI patients initially presenting with symptoms attributable to vertebrobasilar ischemia. 15,16 Bilateral vertebral artery lesions are reported to correspond with a more severe clinical picture and higher rates of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Others hypothesize that operative fixation reduces the risk by stabilizing the spine and decompressing the vessel, thus diminishing the potential for clot propagation. 11,16 Data regarding this issue are limited. The present series of 52 patients is the largest study evaluating the relationship between ischemic stroke from traumatic VA occlusion and cervical spine surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some authors believe that surgical fixation of the cervical spine decompresses the injured vessel and may avoid thrombus propagation, thereby reducing the risk of ischemic stroke. 11,16 A relative lack of data regarding risk of ischemic stroke in the setting of a traumatic VA occlusion with an operative spine injury has led to wide variability in practice ranging from treatment with antiplatelets to prophylactic endovascular occlusion of the occluded VA. A series of 52 patients with traumatic VA occlusions are presented with particular attention to ischemic stroke and cervical spine intervention.abbreviatioNS CTA = CT angiography; TCVI = traumatic cerebrovascular injury; VA = vertebral artery. Submitted November 18, 2014. accepted January 27, 2015. iNclude wheN citiNg Published online July 17, 2015; DOI: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141174.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%