2021
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202114045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptomatic COVID‐19: disease tolerance with efficient anti‐viral immunity against SARS‐CoV‐2

Abstract: The immune responses and mechanisms limiting symptom progression in asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection remain unclear. We comprehensively characterized transcriptomic profiles, cytokine responses, neutralization capacity of antibodies, and cellular immune phenotypes of asymptomatic patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection to identify potential protective mechanisms. Compared to symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients had higher counts of mature neutrophils and lower proportion of CD169 + expressing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(74 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, IFIT3, IFI44L and RSAD3 expression can be induced by viruses which in turn enhances the progress of the viral infection ( 62 64 ), whereas higher intrinsic expression of IFIT3, FOLR3, PI3 and ALOX-15 have all been associated with immune-mediated chronic diseases ( 65 68 ) In contrast, a protective effect of GZMH, CLEC1B, CLEC12A , that have a higher expression in asymptomatic individuals, may be associated with the effectiveness of GZMH in viral eradication ( 69 ) and the ability of CLEC1B and CLEC12A to enhance neutrophil extracellular trap formation, thus presenting an antiviral effect that helps to control systemic virus levels ( 70 ). Despite the fact that our findings have to be validated in a larger independent cohort of prior SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals, taken together with those of the literature support the hypothesis that there are differences in the innate immune responses between clinical and asymptomatic individuals during SARS-CoV-2 infections ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, IFIT3, IFI44L and RSAD3 expression can be induced by viruses which in turn enhances the progress of the viral infection ( 62 64 ), whereas higher intrinsic expression of IFIT3, FOLR3, PI3 and ALOX-15 have all been associated with immune-mediated chronic diseases ( 65 68 ) In contrast, a protective effect of GZMH, CLEC1B, CLEC12A , that have a higher expression in asymptomatic individuals, may be associated with the effectiveness of GZMH in viral eradication ( 69 ) and the ability of CLEC1B and CLEC12A to enhance neutrophil extracellular trap formation, thus presenting an antiviral effect that helps to control systemic virus levels ( 70 ). Despite the fact that our findings have to be validated in a larger independent cohort of prior SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals, taken together with those of the literature support the hypothesis that there are differences in the innate immune responses between clinical and asymptomatic individuals during SARS-CoV-2 infections ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…More recently, Chan et al. also showed in a whole blood transcriptomic analyses that asymptomatic patients display a less robust response to type-I interferon than symptomatic patients, whereas differences between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients may be present at the cellular, innate, and adaptive immune response levels ( 16 )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of RNA sequencing recently explored differentially expressed genes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with COVID-19. The results showed a higher expression of the genes involved in the Th2 pathway, together with the down-regulation of the genes in Th1 and Th17 pathways in asymptomatic individuals [ 35 ]. Our results are consistent with theirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease tolerance declines with increased age, and as a result of deteriorated immunity ( Medzhitov et al, 2012 ) and may differentially affect older or frail individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2. For example, a recent study found that significantly different molecular and cellular responses are mounted in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection by symptomatic patients, compared to asymptomatic patients ( Chan et al, 2021 ) The study, which involved 178 symptomatic patients (age range: 39.4± 12.5 years) and 48 asymptomatic patients (48.2± 15.9), was not designed to test aging or frailty; however, it identified potentially new biomarkers predictive of disease trajectory which may be differentially expressed in older and frail individuals ( Chan et al, 2021 ). The authors found that symptomatic patients had higher counts of mature neutrophils and lower proportion of CD169+ expressing monocytes in the peripheral blood tolerance ( Chan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Clinical Translation Of This Research: Integrating the Mechanisms Of Viral Infectivity With Biomolecular Markers Of Ageing Frailmentioning
confidence: 99%