1979
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetries for Ameslan handshapes and other forms in signers and nonsigners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incidentally, if McKeever were right in claiming that only the prelinguistically deaf substantially lack left-hemisphere linguistic specialization, this would itself tend to confirm the priority of the latter specialization over language. However, according to Virostek and Cutting (1979), RVF superiorities are equally strong (with American Sign Language shapes) for both the congenitally deaf and the hearing. These authors have reviewed other studies that have found this, and conclude that auditory experience is unnecessary for lateral specialization per se, and that cerebral specialization for language is generally similar for deaf native signers and for nondeaf native speakers of any oral language.…”
Section: Authors' Responsementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Incidentally, if McKeever were right in claiming that only the prelinguistically deaf substantially lack left-hemisphere linguistic specialization, this would itself tend to confirm the priority of the latter specialization over language. However, according to Virostek and Cutting (1979), RVF superiorities are equally strong (with American Sign Language shapes) for both the congenitally deaf and the hearing. These authors have reviewed other studies that have found this, and conclude that auditory experience is unnecessary for lateral specialization per se, and that cerebral specialization for language is generally similar for deaf native signers and for nondeaf native speakers of any oral language.…”
Section: Authors' Responsementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the evidence on hemisphere specialisation among the deaf is not totally uniform [see Virostek and Cutting (1979) for a negative finding] and is clearly dependent on the type of stimuli used, certainly it would appear that auditory and language deprivation is associated with a changed pattern of hemisphere specialisation. One important aspect of this evidence of reduced or altered cerebral assymetry is the implication that the functional organisation of the brain is not irreversibly preprogrammed and therefore may be affected by specific types of early experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%