1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00064-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominanthands in real and imagined motor task performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
60
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are appealing and suggest that motor intentions, executed or simulated, are comparable in young and elderly individuals. High temporal correspondence between overt and covert execution in elderly subjects constitutes a novel result, which expands the welldocumented idea, up to now established in young individuals, of a similar cognitive substrate between overt and covert movement execution [4,7,10,16,27,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Young and Elderly Subjects Presented Similar Behaviour Regarsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are appealing and suggest that motor intentions, executed or simulated, are comparable in young and elderly individuals. High temporal correspondence between overt and covert execution in elderly subjects constitutes a novel result, which expands the welldocumented idea, up to now established in young individuals, of a similar cognitive substrate between overt and covert movement execution [4,7,10,16,27,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Young and Elderly Subjects Presented Similar Behaviour Regarsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Consequently, the temporal underestimation of the motor task during internal simulation may be explained by the fact that subjects, during motor imagery, do not need to visually control the stand-to-sit phase, since movement does not occur, and as a consequence they reduce the duration of this phase and thus the duration of the whole movement. It must be noted that temporal dissimilarities between actual and imagined movements has been already observed in both young [3,7,27] and elderly people [42]. However, further studies are certainly needed to determine the functional significance of this temporal dissociation.…”
Section: Young and Elderly Subjects Presented Similar Behaviour Regarmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we take advantage of the well-known and robust isochrony between imagined and executed movements (Decety et al 1989;Gentili et al 2004;Maruff et al 1999;Papaxanthis et al 2002) to compare motor learning during physical and motor-imagery training. To obtain valid and reliable measurements in motor imagery protocols, several movements are necessary because of the shortduration of a single movement and the coarse resolution of mental movement time measurements (Cerritelli et al 2000;Papaxanthis et al 2002;Sirigu et al 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychophysical experiments have shown that imagined and executed movements have the same spatiotemporal characteristics and obey the same motor rules and biomechanical constraints (Cerritelli et al 2000;Courtine et al 2004;Decety et al 1989;Gentili et al 2004;Maruff et al 1999;Papaxanthis et al 2003). Furthermore, neurophysiological studies have reported that mentally simulated and physically executed movements trigger similar motor representations and share overlapping neural substrates (Ehrsson et al 2003;Jeannerod 2001;Papaxanthis et al 2003;Sirigu et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%