2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetrical fault analysis on distribution feeders with inverter interfaced distributed generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary conditions are the fault currents and voltages equations seen from the faulty ports, which have been presented in the earlier research work in [27], and the fault matrix Ya,b,c f shown in expression (10) is used to avoid predefining the boundary conditions according to the fault type. The fault type can be easily defined through Z on and Z g without predefining the boundary conditions [27]. For instance, the fault matrix Ya,b,c f can be set as (10) and ( 11) for single-line-ground (SLG) fault and L-L fault, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Fault Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The boundary conditions are the fault currents and voltages equations seen from the faulty ports, which have been presented in the earlier research work in [27], and the fault matrix Ya,b,c f shown in expression (10) is used to avoid predefining the boundary conditions according to the fault type. The fault type can be easily defined through Z on and Z g without predefining the boundary conditions [27]. For instance, the fault matrix Ya,b,c f can be set as (10) and ( 11) for single-line-ground (SLG) fault and L-L fault, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Fault Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the PQ control strategy and FRT requirements, the IIDG can be modelled as a voltage‐control current source. The positive sequence of the IIDG coupling voltage is sampled to inject the positive‐sequence current during the fault, which can be presented as [27] leftIq=0U>0.9UNleftIqgoodbreak=2(0.9U/UnormalN)IN0.2UNgoodbreak≤U0.9UNleftIq=1.05INU<0.2UN\begin{equation}\left\{ \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{l} {I_{\rm{q}}} = {\rm{0 }}U{\rm{ &gt; 0}}{\rm{.9}}{U_{\rm{N}}}{\rm{ }}\\[5pt] {I_{\rm{q}}} = {\rm{2}}(0.9 - U/{U_{\rm{N}}}){I_{\rm{N}}} \ {\rm{ 0}}{\rm{.2}}{U_{\rm{N}}} \le U \le {\rm{0}}{\rm{.9}}{U_{\rm{N}}}\\[5pt] {I_{\rm{q}}} = 1.05{I_{\rm{N}}} \ U{\rm{ &lt; 0}}{\rm{.2}}{U_{\rm{N}}}{\rm{ }} \end{array} \right.\end{equation} leftId=min()P/U,Imax2Iq2lefttrueİ1DGgoodbreak=()Idcosθ+Iqsinθ+j()IdsinθIqcosθ\begin{equation}\left\{ \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{l} {I_{\rm{d}}} = \min \left( {P/U,\sqrt {I_{\max }^2 - I_{\rm{q}}^2} } \right)\\[7pt] {{\dot I}^1}_{{\rm{DG}}} = \left( {{I_{\rm{d}}}\cos \theta + {I_{\rm{q}}}\sin \theta } \right) + j\left( {{I_{\rm{d}}}\sin \theta - {I_{\rm{q}}}\cos \theta } \right) \end{array} \right.\end{equation}where I d and I q are the active current value and reactive current value, respectively. P is the active power of IIDG.…”
Section: Iidg Model Considering Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation time of the conventional bus-oriented methods depends on the scale of the network [3 , 4] and it is not suitable for electrical engineering. To simplify the calculation process and reduce the calculation time, a new fault current calculation method was proposed, based on the composite-sequence network analysis [5] .…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DG connection into the distribution network (DN) can reduce the carbon emission, diminish the fuel consumption, lower power transmission loss, elevate the voltage profile to improve the power quality, and enhance the power system reliability and security [ 3 , 4 ]. Nonetheless, the DG connection alters the power flow and fault analysis [ 5 , 6 ], challenging the DN planning strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%