“…The Ragone plots of the recently reported graphene-based hybrid supercapacitors are compared to those of the proposed GMS/AC cell and are shown in Figure 6 b. The gravimetric energy density of the GMS/AC cell was higher than those of other very recently reported devices, such as the carbon nanotube–MnO 2 supercapacitor (42 Wh/kg) [ 20 ], the carbon fiber–MnO 2 supercapacitor (49.4 Wh/kg) [ 19 ], the MnO 2 @CNTs/Ni network-based symmetrical supercapacitor (94.4 Wh/kg) [ 21 ], the graphene/MnO 2 nanoparticle hydrogel-based asymmetric supercapacitor (21.2 Wh/kg) [ 49 ], the conjugated indole-based macromolecule (30 Wh/kg) [ 50 ], the graphene/RuO 2 hybrid capacitor (20.1 Wh/kg) [ 51 ], rGO/mixed-valence MnO 2 composite (50 Wh/kg) [ 52 ], GS/Ni(OH) 2 nanoplates (53 Wh/kg) [ 46 ], thermally reduced GO supercapacitors (62.5 Wh/kg) [ 43 ], porous Ni 3 S 2 /CoNi 2 S 4 three-dimensional-network structure (62.2 Wh/kg) [ 53 ], asymmetric supercapacitors based on ionic liquid complex intercalated rGO (67.8 Wh/kg) [ 48 ], highly graphitic carbon–tipped MnO 2 /mesoporous carbon/MnO 2 hybrid nanowires (37 Wh/kg) [ 45 ], ionic-liquid-assisted Cu 2 O nanoparticles/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite (64.2 Wh/kg) [ 47 ], and mixed-valence sulfur-doped V 6 O 13−x (45 Wh/kg) [ 44 ]. Thus, the excellent performance of the GMS/AC cell will find suitable applications that demand high energy density storage devices.…”