2018
DOI: 10.1122/1.5009192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric soft-hard colloidal mixtures: Osmotic effects, glassy states and rheology

Abstract: Whereas mixtures of colloids and non-adsorbing polymers have been studied in great detail in the last two decades, binary colloidal mixtures have not received much attention. Yet, fragmental evidence from asymmetric mixtures of hard spheres indicates a wide-ranging, complex behavior from liquid to crystal to single glass and to double glass, and respective rich rheology. Recently, we addressed the question of softness by investigating a mixture of soft and virtually hard colloidal spheres. We found an unpreced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(154 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a value is much lower than that of a typical colloidal glass of (other) soft particles investigated in the literature. 18,19,29,[77][78][79] This simple observation is reminiscent of the behavior of hard sphere suspensions 80 which reveals that a colloidal crystal is characterized by lower dynamic moduli compared to the respective repulsive glass. Whereas this is a simple observation, it certainly motivates more investigations in the direction of linking the viscoelastic response of soft colloidal crystals and their respective glasses.…”
Section: Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a value is much lower than that of a typical colloidal glass of (other) soft particles investigated in the literature. 18,19,29,[77][78][79] This simple observation is reminiscent of the behavior of hard sphere suspensions 80 which reveals that a colloidal crystal is characterized by lower dynamic moduli compared to the respective repulsive glass. Whereas this is a simple observation, it certainly motivates more investigations in the direction of linking the viscoelastic response of soft colloidal crystals and their respective glasses.…”
Section: Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Examples of spherical soft colloidal systems are vesicles, dendrimers, 2 microgels, [3][4][5] block copolymer micelles, [6][7][8][9] polymer-grafted nanoparticles (PGNPs), [10][11][12][13][14] and star polymers. [15][16][17][18][19] Unlike hard-spheres, for which the phase diagram and associated dynamic properties have been exhaustively investigated, 20 the respective consequences of softness have not been fully explored. For instance, bridging the gap between ultrasoft stars and polymer-grafted nanoparticles by identifying similarities and distinct features in the behavior still presents formidable challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research to understand the physical subtleties behind the formation of vitried states, is still very active in the so matter scientic community. [1][2][3][4][5] Although it is hard to describe it in a few words, a succinct description of a vitrication process should include the fact that when a colloidal system vitries, either by adding mass, reducing volume or temperature, or by shear, there appears a prominent dynamical arrest of the colloids. This phenomenon is observed not only in hard-sphere mixtures, 1,2,5,6 but in so ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 , 30 The difference in softness between the two types of particles results in distinctly unique interactions between the components, eliciting a diverse set of states both glassy and phase-separated, intrinsically relying on the penetrability of the constituent particles. 31 33 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%