2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric polyelectrolyte multilayer membranes with ultrathin separation layers for highly efficient micropollutant removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
81
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the structural model of PEMs, one would expect that membranes prepared from [PAH/PAA] will consist of small yet hydrophilic pores, whereas [PSS/PAH] would lead to membranes with larger, more hydrophobic pores. Indeed, this behavior is perfectly reflected in the results of te Brinke et al ( 21 ) shown in Table 3 , where the asymmetric [PSS/PAH] 8.5 [PAH/PAA] 2 and [PSS/PAH] 7.5 [PAH/PAA] 3 membranes have higher micropollutant retentions (and lower MWCO values) and thus lower effective pore sizes than the symmetric [PSS/PAH] 10.5 membranes. In addition, the NR results reveal that [PAH/PAA] layers are more hydrated than the [PSS/PAH] layers (compare 55–63% water content with ∼47%) supporting the hypothesis that the higher charge density [PAH/PAA] layers are more hydrophilic than the [PSS/PAH] layers.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to the structural model of PEMs, one would expect that membranes prepared from [PAH/PAA] will consist of small yet hydrophilic pores, whereas [PSS/PAH] would lead to membranes with larger, more hydrophobic pores. Indeed, this behavior is perfectly reflected in the results of te Brinke et al ( 21 ) shown in Table 3 , where the asymmetric [PSS/PAH] 8.5 [PAH/PAA] 2 and [PSS/PAH] 7.5 [PAH/PAA] 3 membranes have higher micropollutant retentions (and lower MWCO values) and thus lower effective pore sizes than the symmetric [PSS/PAH] 10.5 membranes. In addition, the NR results reveal that [PAH/PAA] layers are more hydrated than the [PSS/PAH] layers (compare 55–63% water content with ∼47%) supporting the hypothesis that the higher charge density [PAH/PAA] layers are more hydrophilic than the [PSS/PAH] layers.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For comparable asymmetric multilayers, te Brinke et al roughly estimated the thicknesses of the top [PAH/PAA] layers to be ∼160 Å for the three-layer system and ∼40 Å for the two-layer system. 21 The discrepancy between the ellipsometry measurements of te Brinke et al and the thicknesses measured here by NR could be due to penetration of [PAH/PAA] into the support multilayer of [PSS/PAH]. While these estimates based on ellipsometry measurements are reasonable, NR reveals that the [PAH/d-PAA] 3 separation layer is thinner than first reported.…”
Section: Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rejection of VFAs is on the lower side in the case of NF compared to RO, especially considering the unusually low pressure applied for RO (with higher pressure, higher rejection can be expected). If the goal is also NaCl (or other monovalent salt) passage besides VFA retention, then further consideration of such LbL NF membranes might be worthwhile, especially if tighter LbL membranes become available commercially, such as the asymmetric membrane developed by te Brinke et al [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%