2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.78.193402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric line shapes for medium energy H and He ions undergoing a large-angle collision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…͑2͒ is calculated, using the parameter 2 for the energy-loss straggling along the incoming and outgoing paths K i 2 ͑⌰͒⌬W 2 in + ⌬W 2 out and the asymmetry parameter ␣ ͑or 0 −1 ͒ either from experiments 19 or from calculations. 18,26 ͑vi͒ For each ith element in the ͑x,y,z͒ composition, we calculate the yield through Eq.…”
Section: ͑I͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…͑2͒ is calculated, using the parameter 2 for the energy-loss straggling along the incoming and outgoing paths K i 2 ͑⌰͒⌬W 2 in + ⌬W 2 out and the asymmetry parameter ␣ ͑or 0 −1 ͒ either from experiments 19 or from calculations. 18,26 ͑vi͒ For each ith element in the ͑x,y,z͒ composition, we calculate the yield through Eq.…”
Section: ͑I͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18͒ can be used to describe asymmetrical energy losses found in MEIS experiments. 19 Indeed, the importance of the asymmetry of the energy loss in the characterization of nanoparticles is an important issue and was never investigated before, and as it will be shown in what follows, the use of Gaussian energyloss distribution may lead to important misinterpretations of the MEIS spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface peaks are decomposed into three scattering components from the top-, second-, and third-layer I and Rb atoms (solid curves). Note that the shadowing effect was weakened owing to large root-mean-square thermal vibration amplitudes expected from the low Debye temperature of 115 K. Here, we employed the EMG function as the line shape [12,13]. The best fit was obtained by assuming the energy differences ( E 1−2 ) of 520 ± 20 and 540 ± 30 eV between the scattering components from the top-and second-layer I and Rb atoms, respectively.…”
Section: Nd-layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, it is essential to see the hitting probability for the atoms of each layer as well as the line shape for each scattering component. Concerning the latter, we employed the exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) line shape [12,13] and the Lindhard-Scharff formula [14] to calculate the energy straggling, whose reliabilities were confirmed experimentally in advance [13,[15][16][17]. The hitting probability for the atoms of each layer is calculated by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of ion trajectories, which are explained in detail below.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulations Of Ion Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The single collision parameter for the EMG function was obtained from CasP. 16,17 In Figure 1(a), we show one of the TEM images used to measure the QDs diameter distribution along with a higher resolution image, where the crystalline structure of the CdSe nucleus can be seen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%