2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2014.6953416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric interleaving in low-voltage CMOS power management with multiple supply rails

Abstract: Recent years have seen the proliferation of electronic devices that require multi-phase power converters to provide heterogeneous power rails to different systems. Typical systems will utilize symmetric interleaving as a method of reducing the input current ripple for the power converter. Asymmetric interleaving is a method of control that allows for a further reduction, and in some cases complete cancellation, of this input current ripple. This work looks at some of the challenges for a practical implementati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, computational requirements are increased. Reference [33] contains an analysis of the trade-off between lookup table size and computing time for a related application. The corresponding control architecture for adjusting the phase-shift of all three converters is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, computational requirements are increased. Reference [33] contains an analysis of the trade-off between lookup table size and computing time for a related application. The corresponding control architecture for adjusting the phase-shift of all three converters is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will facilitate ripple minimization in DMPPT applications such as described in [20]- [28]. Our previous work in this area can be found in [30]- [33]. A key contribution of our proposed analysis technique is that it is based on a more universally applicable frequencydomain description of the converter current waveforms, as opposed to a time-domain description as outlined in [34], [35].…”
Section: Mathematical Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boxed area of Figure 3c highlights the system components that are considered in this work, which constitute four series-connected cells and one MPPT. The parallel output connection of the individual MPPT converters can be further utilized for interleaved operation and ripple cancellation [17], [18], enabling smaller individual output capacitance for each converter. Moreover, since our proposed MPPT converter provides maximization of its input power, there is no inadvertent coupling between parallel MPPT converters.…”
Section: A Conventional Mppt Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P&O technique is well-suited for digital implementation, which we have chosen for our 0.35 µm CMOS design. Digital control was chosen for its flexibility in operating conditions, as we explore switching frequencies over 500 kHz-1.5 MHz, as well as the future possibility of synchronizing the operation of several MPPT converters to achieve ripple reduction through interleaved operation [17], [18]. Moreover, the operating conditions in our intended application are expected to change very slowly with time, enabling very low MPPT update frequencies.…”
Section: System Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%