The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4266(99)00097-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric information, dividend reductions, and contagion effects in bank stock returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results are consistent with Michaely et al (1995) and Dasilas and Leventis (2011); they report that decrease dividend announcements have a negative impact on share prices. Bessler and Nohel (2000) In contrast to this stream of research that focuses on short term effect, there are other studies which explore long term valuation effects of dividend announcements. On the long term, dividend impact could be explained by the efficient markets hypothesis beside the signaling theory.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results are consistent with Michaely et al (1995) and Dasilas and Leventis (2011); they report that decrease dividend announcements have a negative impact on share prices. Bessler and Nohel (2000) In contrast to this stream of research that focuses on short term effect, there are other studies which explore long term valuation effects of dividend announcements. On the long term, dividend impact could be explained by the efficient markets hypothesis beside the signaling theory.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bessler and Nohel (1996) postulate that announcement effect of dividends cuts should be more severe for banks than for nonfinancial firms due to the fact that 'large' banks may lose large corporate customers if a bank is feared to have financial difficulties as evidenced by the fact that dividends need to be cut. Bessler and Nohel (2000) found that dividends cut announcement by banks can create information externalities for the banks that do not cut dividends. They suggest that if loan portfolios are correlated across banks, then, an announcement of dividend cut by some banks can create contagion i.e., the share prices of the non-dividend cutting banks would also decrease following such announcements because investors panic in reaction to bad news and the bank stocks go down regardless of their financial conditions.…”
Section: Regulatory Influence On the Dividendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on regionally syndicated indices, Bekaert et al (2005) also unveil spillovers from the U.S. to Europe, Asia andLatin America during 1980-1986. Focusing on corporate announcements, Lang and Stulz (1992) show that bankruptcy announcements by banks can have a negative effect on other banks, which is in line with Kaufman's (1994) argument that failure of one bank can spread to the rest of the banking system through bank runs. In a similar fashion, liquidity-related announcements (secondary equity offerings) and profit-related announcements (dividend cuts) by banks can impact the banking sector in a contagious manner (Slovin et al, 1992;Bessler and Nohel, 2000). As an example, Slovin et al (1999) provide evidence that dividend cuts by U.S. regional banks exerted a competitive effect on their geographic rivals during 1975-1992.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%