2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric exchange bias in NiFe/FeMn/NiFe multilayer films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the overlap of several hysteresis loops with different exchange bias fields, the hysteresis loop manifests itself as a multiple-stage reversal. Similar behavior has previously been observed 16,17 for the exchange biased system using FeMn, where it was claimed that the bottom interface normally has a better unidirectional anisotropy constant and the reason for that is that the top interface is rougher than the bottom interface. 16 For the case of FeCo-MnIr multilayers since J K acting on each interface is identical the loop manifests itself as a single-shifted loop.…”
Section: ͑2͒supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Due to the overlap of several hysteresis loops with different exchange bias fields, the hysteresis loop manifests itself as a multiple-stage reversal. Similar behavior has previously been observed 16,17 for the exchange biased system using FeMn, where it was claimed that the bottom interface normally has a better unidirectional anisotropy constant and the reason for that is that the top interface is rougher than the bottom interface. 16 For the case of FeCo-MnIr multilayers since J K acting on each interface is identical the loop manifests itself as a single-shifted loop.…”
Section: ͑2͒supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Due to the overlap of several hysteresis loops with different exchange bias fields, the hysteresis loop manifests itself as a multiple-stage reversal. Previously, several groups [11,12] observed similar behavior for the exchange-biased system using FeMn, where they claimed that the bottom interface normally has ARTICLE IN PRESS a better unidirectional anisotropy constant. The reason for this is that the top interface is rougher than the bottom interface [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Previously, several groups [11,12] observed similar behavior for the exchange-biased system using FeMn, where they claimed that the bottom interface normally has ARTICLE IN PRESS a better unidirectional anisotropy constant. The reason for this is that the top interface is rougher than the bottom interface [11]. Another interesting point that should be mentioned is the vertical shift of the hysteresis loop that was similarly observed in several systems [13,14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For FeMn-based spin valve systems, the NiFe buffer layer is usually used to stabilize the AF g-phase, resulting in NiFe/FeMn/NiFe trilayer-like structure, where the bottom and top NiFe layers are, respectively, called as seed and pinned layers. When the seed and pinned layer thicknesses are different and/or the lower (NiFe/FeMn) and upper (FeMn/ NiFe) interfaces have substantial structural or/and magnetic differences, the spin valve has an asymmetrical M(H) curve with two regions: one related to the lower (NiFe/FeMn) interface and the other associated with the upper (NiFe/FeMn) one, each one with its respective H ex value [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it has been reported [18] that the EB main parameters depend on several factors, such as: interfacial spin configuration, interface roughness between the FM and AF materials, textures (structural and magnetic), crystalline grain size and AF layer thickness. For example, Lee et al [17] have studied the NiFe (10 nm)/FeMn (30 nm)/NiFe (10 nm) trilayer by magnetization and transmission electron microscoNiFe (TEM) measurements and they have found that the seed and pinned layers have distinct H ex values due to different roughness values at the lower and upper NiFe/FeMn interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%