2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric effects of the international transmission of US financial stress. A threshold-VAR approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the nonlinearity of responses in favor of turbulent periods of financial conditions is observed. This is not surprising, as during periods of high financial stress, the impact of financial stress shocks on economic activity is different from the impact in normal economic conditions (see, e.g., Evgenidis & Tsagkanos, 2017). Moreover, looking at the left panel of Figure 2b that represents the responses to financial stress shocks in high and low regimes of inventory, we find that the responses to financial stress shocks are slightly bigger in low inventory regimes, but this nonlinearity in responses is not large and strong.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the nonlinearity of responses in favor of turbulent periods of financial conditions is observed. This is not surprising, as during periods of high financial stress, the impact of financial stress shocks on economic activity is different from the impact in normal economic conditions (see, e.g., Evgenidis & Tsagkanos, 2017). Moreover, looking at the left panel of Figure 2b that represents the responses to financial stress shocks in high and low regimes of inventory, we find that the responses to financial stress shocks are slightly bigger in low inventory regimes, but this nonlinearity in responses is not large and strong.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as Nazlioglu, Soytas, and Gupta (2015) argue, the oil price and financial stress are related through their impact on economic activity and on investors’ behavior. The effect of financial shocks is found to be asymmetric, depending on whether the economy is in a high or a normal financial stress period (Evgenidis & Tsagkanos, 2017; Nazlioglu et al, 2015). Sari, Soytas, and Hacihasanoglu (2011) show that a higher uncertainty in stock markets adversely affects the energy futures prices, and Cheng, Kirilenko, and Xiong (2015) used the volatility index (VIX) to predict changes in trading patterns in the commodity futures markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the latter has no impact on the European CLIFS indices. The result does not necessarily question the findings, for instance, by Apostolakis and Papadopoulos (2014) as well as Evgenidis and Tsagkanos (2017) who accentuate the role of the USA as a major financial risk propagator among advanced economies. Rather, it may stem from the fact that the VIX index produces a contemporaneous, but stronger effect on real economic activity compared to national financial stress, thereby masking the effect of the latter.…”
Section: Country‐level Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…First, there has been a well-document period of austerity following the financial crises of c. 2008. The negative effects of financial stress on markets transmitted from one market to another (for example, the US to the Eurozone) are well documented by Evgenidis and Tsagkanos (2017) and Tsagkanos, Evgenidis and Vartholomatou (2018). Second, in 2015, the British Government allowed pension freedoms that allowed the newly retired to draw down lump sums of cash rather than the previous obligation to invest pension amounts into annuities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%