Behavioral pattern separation (BPS) paradigms ask participants to discriminate previously encoded (old) stimuli from highly similar (lure) and categorically distinct (novel) stimuli. The lure-old discrimination, thought to uniquely reflect pattern separation in the hippocampal formation, is typically pitted against the traditional novel-old discrimination. However, BPS paradigms have measured lure-old discrimination neither consistently across studies nor in such a way that allows for accurate comparison to novel-old discrimination. Therefore, we advocate for signal detection theory (SDT) as a unified framework. Moreover, we compare SDT with previously used measures of lure-old discrimination, indicating how other formulas' inaccuracies can lead to erroneous conclusions.Tasks measuring behavioral pattern separation (BPS) are distinguished from standard tests of memory recognition by the inclusion of stimuli that are highly similar to those previously encoded. Because each of these "lure" stimuli differs only slightly from its corresponding previously encoded "old" stimulus, successful discrimination of old from lure stimuli is thought to denote particularly detailed memory representations of the old stimuli. In contrast, it has been suggested that successful discrimination of old from "novel" stimuli (i.e., categorically new, as commonly used in tests of recognition) need not rely on detailed representations of the old stimuli, but rather can be achieved even if the old stimuli have only gist-based representations. Consistent with this distinction, several studies imply a dissociation between novelold and lure-old discrimination. For example, using the BPS paradigm, researchers have argued that only detail-based lure-old discrimination is impaired in healthy aging (Stark et al. 2013) and enhanced by post-study caffeine (Borota et al. 2014). Claims from a more recent study (Reagh and Yassa 2014) support an even stronger, double dissociation: repeated-encoding benefits gist-based, novel-old discrimination (a finding known even to Ebbinghaus (1885)), but surprisingly impairs detail-based, lureold discrimination. One major concern-particularly with findings such as these, where there appear to be differences between novel-old and lure-old discrimination-is that the measures used for lure-old discrimination vary from each other and from those used for novel-old discrimination. A unified measurement approach is needed if one is to reliably characterize lure-old discrimination as well as properly compare it to novel-old discrimination.Here, we propose the use of signal detection theory (SDT) (Green and Swets 1966) for measuring lure-old discrimination. We reran the aforementioned BPS paradigm (Reagh and Yassa 2014), which tested effects of repeated encoding on both detail and gist-based memory representations. We demonstrate not only that SDT is an appropriate framework for measuring lure-old discrimination but that SDT formulas yield opposite results to those reported: lure-old discrimination, like novel-old discrimin...