2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric dominance as a potential source of bias in hedonic testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the participants rated their liking for 12 samples in the first session, while they rated their liking for only one sample in the choice and no-choice sessions (the sample that they consumed). The sequential monadic procedure used in the first session may have led to hedonic contrast, where "good things making less good things even worse" (Zellner, Allen, Henley, & Parker, 2006;Hayes, DePasquale, & Moser, 2011). This effect was not symmetric: for the pleasant products, the scores in the choice and no-choice sessions (7.5 and 7.8 for the apple purees and desserts, respectively) were slightly lower than or equivalent to the scores in the first session (8.1 for the apple purees and the desserts).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the participants rated their liking for 12 samples in the first session, while they rated their liking for only one sample in the choice and no-choice sessions (the sample that they consumed). The sequential monadic procedure used in the first session may have led to hedonic contrast, where "good things making less good things even worse" (Zellner, Allen, Henley, & Parker, 2006;Hayes, DePasquale, & Moser, 2011). This effect was not symmetric: for the pleasant products, the scores in the choice and no-choice sessions (7.5 and 7.8 for the apple purees and desserts, respectively) were slightly lower than or equivalent to the scores in the first session (8.1 for the apple purees and the desserts).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our second test, when an intermediate firmness level was evaluated alongside the preferred samples from Test 1, the most preferred firmness shifted from G’ = 25,000 Pa [ 17 , 29 ] to a brittle suppository with G’ = 12,500 Pa. Notably, preferences may be influenced by the other options presented within the choice set [ 37 ]. The gels of varying firmness prepared previously [ 17 , 29 ] had varied ratios of κ- and ι-carrageenan; thus, firmness was partially confounded with elongation properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food choice and preference have particularity and temporary dependence compared to items requiring follow-up treatment such as microwave or television [6]. One article suggested that students are not regularly taking fruits and vegetables even if the school lunch has been offered to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%