2023
DOI: 10.3390/nano13020309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric Coordination Environment Engineering of Atomic Catalysts for CO2 Reduction

Abstract: Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have emerged as well-known catalysts in renewable energy storage and conversion systems. Several supports have been developed for stabilizing single-atom catalytic sites, e.g., organic-, metal-, and carbonaceous matrices. Noticeably, the metal species and their local atomic coordination environments have a strong influence on the electrocatalytic capabilities of metal atom active centers. In particular, asymmetric atom electrocatalysts exhibit unique properties and an unexpected ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some progresses are still bottleneck issues, including relatively high cost, complex preparation, low FE NH3 , high overpotential, competitive HER, and unsatisfied catalytic stability. As expected, combining nanomaterials, DFT axis, and in situ/operando characterization would be one of the possible ways to understand the ENR mechanism, which can further provide the directions to design efficient nanomaterials capable of achieving large‐scale industrialization applications in terms of both environmental protection and high value‐added chemical production 210–214 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some progresses are still bottleneck issues, including relatively high cost, complex preparation, low FE NH3 , high overpotential, competitive HER, and unsatisfied catalytic stability. As expected, combining nanomaterials, DFT axis, and in situ/operando characterization would be one of the possible ways to understand the ENR mechanism, which can further provide the directions to design efficient nanomaterials capable of achieving large‐scale industrialization applications in terms of both environmental protection and high value‐added chemical production 210–214 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As expected, combining nanomaterials, DFT axis, and in situ/operando characterization would be one of the possible ways to understand the ENR mechanism, which can further provide the directions to design efficient nanomaterials capable of achieving large-scale industrialization applications in terms of both environmental protection and high value-added chemical production. [210][211][212][213][214] To promote the development of efficient catalysis material and reaction systems for ENR, here, we list the problem and put forward some perspectives on further pathways to give an insight into current challenges and future opportunities in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90–99 Presently, the bromine and iodine-positive electrodes appear to be more promising, owing to their high solubilities and kinetic reversibility as common electrode materials (CFs or GFs). 100–106…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99] Presently, the bromine and iodine-positive electrodes appear to be more promising, owing to their high solubilities and kinetic reversibility as common electrode materials (CFs or GFs). [100][101][102][103][104][105][106] So far, the ZBRFB has already been applied to LSESA. Long energy storage times and the potential to deliver full power in seconds have led RFB to be considered one of the most promising electrochemical ESS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52][53][54][55] Compared with the FePSe 3 / NS (0.79 eV), after the Mn doping, the ΔG H* value of the Mn-FePSe 3 /NS becomes 0.33 eV (Fig. 6d), indicative of optimized HER kinetics, [56][57][58][59][60][61] which is responsible for the observed HER performance (Fig. 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%