2018
DOI: 10.3386/w25086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric Consumption Smoothing

Abstract: NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual inspection of Figure 5b shows that high-asset households with positive income shocks increase consumption, but do not appear to decrease consumption when income falls. This finding is consistent with evidence in Baugh et al (2018).…”
Section: Consumption Smoothing By Assetssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Visual inspection of Figure 5b shows that high-asset households with positive income shocks increase consumption, but do not appear to decrease consumption when income falls. This finding is consistent with evidence in Baugh et al (2018).…”
Section: Consumption Smoothing By Assetssupporting
confidence: 93%
“… Fairlie (2020) documents that African-American business owners experiencing a drop of 26% in business activity from pre-COVID-19 levels compared to only 11% drop for White business owners by May, 2020. Farrell et al (2020a) similarly finds that cash balances of White-owned restaurants doubled in May compared to only 38% increase for Black-owned restaurants.5 These studies estimate the extent to which households can smooth transitory variation in income generated by, for example, randomized timing of disbursement of economic stimulus(Parker et al, 2013;Broda and Parker, 2014), arrival of tax refunds(Baugh et al, 2020), household liquidity shock(Gross and Souleles, 2002), and unemployment insurance (Ganong and Noel, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data is not a random sample of the population, but it appears to be widely representative, with some exceptions. In Baugh et al (2018) and Baugh et al (2020), the authors illustrate the income distribution of users in this database relative to the U.S. Census. While the raw sample differs from the true income distribution in the United States, the sample covers users with a wide range of incomes rather than solely identifying users of a particular income group.…”
Section: Transaction-level Linked-account Datamentioning
confidence: 99%