2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1729126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric Adjustments in the Ethanol and Grains Markets

Abstract: This paper examines the long-and short-run asymmetric adjustments for nine pairs of spot and futures prices, itemized as three own pairs for three different bio-fuel ethanol types, three own pairs for three related agricultural products, namely corn, soybeans and sugar, and three

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, a shock that results in weakening/widening of corn basis because of a rise in futures price (relative to spot price) will tend to revert quickly back toward the equilibrium via a corresponding rises in the spot price. In this case, the price adjustment for corn exhibits a downward rigidity and a positive asymmetric price adjustment, which is consistent with the findings for corn in Chang et al (). However, the consistent M‐TAR model for soybeans indicates that false|ρ1false|>|ρ2|, meaning that a shock resulting in a strengthening/ narrowing of soybeans basis that is owing to a decline in futures price (relative to spot price) will revert much more quickly towards the equilibrium than a shock leading to a weakening/widening basis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, a shock that results in weakening/widening of corn basis because of a rise in futures price (relative to spot price) will tend to revert quickly back toward the equilibrium via a corresponding rises in the spot price. In this case, the price adjustment for corn exhibits a downward rigidity and a positive asymmetric price adjustment, which is consistent with the findings for corn in Chang et al (). However, the consistent M‐TAR model for soybeans indicates that false|ρ1false|>|ρ2|, meaning that a shock resulting in a strengthening/ narrowing of soybeans basis that is owing to a decline in futures price (relative to spot price) will revert much more quickly towards the equilibrium than a shock leading to a weakening/widening basis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, for the consistent M‐TAR model, it is found that the F ‐test for symmetric adjustment can be rejected at the 1% level of significance for corn and at the 5% level of significance for soybeans. The findings of the F ‐tests based on the consistent M‐TAR model are consistent with Chang et al () and provide strong evidence in support of asymmetric price adjustment for both corn and soybeans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where Δ represents the first difference, I t represents the Heaviside indicator, I t measures the difference between TAR and M-TAR specification (Koto, 2015), ρ represents a not serially correlated error term (e t ) and λ t is the variable indicator of threshold. The coefficient of ρ 1 and ρ 2 is expected to be negative (Chang et al, 2012) as it measures adjustment towards long-run equilibrium. Absolute value of ρs indicates the speed of adjustment.…”
Section: Tar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%