I. THE PROBLEMSir Frederick Hoyle is widely considered to be one of the founders of the field of nuclear astrophysics. Being well acquainted with both nuclear physics and astrophysics, he was one of the first to bridge the gap, and, with others such as Gamow, Eddington, and Fowler, sought to provide answers to the questions of how the elements were generated and what powered stars like the Sun.Hoyle, together with Fowler and the Burbidges, worked out a feasible and robust theory of nucleosynthesis: a process by which all of the naturally-occurring elements could be created. Successive captures of protons, neutrons, and alpha particles, along with subsequent beta, gamma, and particle decays, proved capable of stepping up through the nuclear chart. Even while details of the astrophysical context for nucleosynthesis were still debated, the process was clear, and clearly fell into its own new category: nuclear astrophysics. Hoyle's scenario remains, to this day, the broad picture depicting the evolution of stars and the elements within them.But, somewhat surprisingly, Hoyle's key paper on the development of the theory of stellar nucleosynthesis, which preceded the now-famous B2FH 1 publication by several years, "received relatively little attention at the time, perhaps because it was published in a new astrophysical journal 2 that was relatively unknown to the nuclear physics community". 3 That bears stating once more: the first introduction of Hoyle's nucleosynthesis mechanism went largely unnoticed in nuclear physics because it was published in an astrophysics journal.One can wonder how the history of the field of nuclear astrophysics would have played out differently, had a single journal been available to researchers working in both fields. There are still many important questions in nuclear astrophysics which remain unanswered, potentially because the communication between nuclear physics and astrophysics is still as difficult as in Hoyle's day.