1995
DOI: 10.1086/117616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Astrometry for Determining the MACHO Mass and Trajectory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the images cannot be resolved, it may be possible to measure the deflection of the image centroid (Hog, Novikov, & Polnarev 1995;Miyamoto & Yoshi 1995;Walker 1995), which is given by…”
Section: Follow-up Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the images cannot be resolved, it may be possible to measure the deflection of the image centroid (Hog, Novikov, & Polnarev 1995;Miyamoto & Yoshi 1995;Walker 1995), which is given by…”
Section: Follow-up Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The half-brightness radius of LD and AD models was fixed: R 1/2 = 0.2R E (this choice was determined by the AD1 model, see comments after formula (47)) and that of the Gaussian source was varied to get better fitting; here P = 3/2 for PL model and q = 1 for LD model. One example of the relative light curve differences η(T) according to (62) between LD, AD1 and the best fitted Gaussian models is shown in Figure 4. As we see from this figure, usage of an optimal size of the Gaussian model can diminish η m as compared to the average estimate from Table 2 dealing with the same R 1/2 for all the models.…”
Section: Gaussian Fittings Of Accretion Disk and Limb Darkeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of the lensing object can be derived from an analysis of the light curve, but unfortunately there are degeneracies between lens mass, relative proper motion, and relative parallax. These degeneracies can be broken by astrometric observations, determining the position of the center of light as a function of time during the encounter (Miyamoto & Yoshii 1995).…”
Section: A Quirrenbachmentioning
confidence: 99%