2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2129-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees

Abstract: BackgroundEvolutionary histories can be discordant across the genome, and such discordances need to be considered in reconstructing the species phylogeny. ASTRAL is one of the leading methods for inferring species trees from gene trees while accounting for gene tree discordance. ASTRAL uses dynamic programming to search for the tree that shares the maximum number of quartet topologies with input gene trees, restricting itself to a predefined set of bipartitions.ResultsWe introduce ASTRAL-III, which substantial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
1,528
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,782 publications
(1,695 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
10
1,528
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To gauge the extent of ILS in our dataset, we performed concordance analyses using two different approaches. First, we used ASTRAL (Zhang, Rabiee, Sayyari, & Mirarab, ) to assess quartet support for the branch (i.e. the percentage of quartets in single‐locus trees which agree with the inferred concatenated tree).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gauge the extent of ILS in our dataset, we performed concordance analyses using two different approaches. First, we used ASTRAL (Zhang, Rabiee, Sayyari, & Mirarab, ) to assess quartet support for the branch (i.e. the percentage of quartets in single‐locus trees which agree with the inferred concatenated tree).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generated 200 BS gene trees for each locus, with the termination condition parameter reduced by half the default value (i.e., genthreshfortopoterm = 10,000) (Zwickl, ). Gene trees were permitted to contain polytomies (collapsebranches = 1), which has been shown to improve species tree topology (Zhang et al, ). We inferred species trees from these optimal gene trees using the summary coalescent program ASTRAL‐III v5.6.1 (Mirarab et al, ; Sayyari & Mirarab, ; Zhang et al, ), with nodal support measured by the 200 multilocus BS replicates (Seo, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed the recovered genes using coalescent‐based and concatenated maximum likelihood (ML) methods; the latter is likely to result in misinferences if there are instances of incomplete lineage sorting (e.g., Maddison, ), but we included it as a point of reference for the coalescent analysis. We used ASTRAL‐III (Zhang et al., ) with default settings for coalescent‐based analyses on both the complete 264‐gene data set and on a partial 232‐gene data set that excluded genes with potential paralogs, and also for estimating branch support for the resulting species trees using both local posterior probabilities (LPP; Sayyari and Mirarab, ) and multi‐locus bootstrapping (MLB; Seo, ). LPPs measure support for a quadripartition (the four clusters around each internal branch in a species tree) and are computed using the proportion of gene‐tree quartets that agree or disagree with an internal branch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%